Live data from Hacker News

Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta

thetimes.com

11–20 of 615 posts

Re: Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta

#11
A good reminder not to sign contracts with non-disparagement clauses, if you can help it. Seems like good territory for California to ban like they did with non-competes. At the very least they should be restricted from inclusion in severance agreements - at that point the company already has you over a barrel.

Re: Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta

#12
post #6

> The ruling, awarded without proper notice by an emergency arbitrator (a non-court mediator that is part of the American Arbitration Association), actually said nothing about the truth or otherwise of Sarah’s devastating claims in her book. It made no mention of defamation. Instead, it relied on a non-disparagement clause in her severance agreement with Facebook to silence her. It's well past time to rein in arbitra…

she agreed to it to get a severance payment

Re: Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta

#13
This is going to be one of those threads with LLM-grade comments about stealing your information and arbitration and this and that but I'm early enough that I can shame all of you first by at least having read the first page of this book so I can tell you that the author has had an interesting life. The book starts with an actual shark attack. It's pretty famous, it's in the news and stuff: https://www.thepress.co.nz/nz-news/360667776/sister-hits-bac...

The story is pretty close to this one in TAL: https://www.thisamericanlife.org/476/transcript so many people on reddit speculate it's the same. I never verified or I missed that in the book if it says so.

Then she apparently nearly died again giving birth to one of her children. And then here with the Zuckexposé. I'm reminded that people live all sorts of lives full of detail and story. Great stuff.

Re: Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta

#14
post #6

> The ruling, awarded without proper notice by an emergency arbitrator (a non-court mediator that is part of the American Arbitration Association), actually said nothing about the truth or otherwise of Sarah’s devastating claims in her book. It made no mention of defamation. Instead, it relied on a non-disparagement clause in her severance agreement with Facebook to silence her. It's well past time to rein in arbitra…

she agreed to it to get a severance payment

That should be illegal, too. Or the permissible scope of such an agreement heavily limited.

Re: Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta

#15
post #4

I'm going to place an order for the book right now. I encourage you all to do the same. We the people hold the power to keep in check the immoral companies, governments, and other unscrupulous entities that would exploit the collective to enrich the few. And ultimately that's through our money and how we spend it. Screw Meta and their anti-human business model.

It’s also a damn good book!

More like Catch-22 than a cheap ”spill the tea” ride.

Re: Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta

#16
post #4

I'm going to place an order for the book right now. I encourage you all to do the same. We the people hold the power to keep in check the immoral companies, governments, and other unscrupulous entities that would exploit the collective to enrich the few. And ultimately that's through our money and how we spend it. Screw Meta and their anti-human business model.

[flagged]

Re: Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta

#17
post #9

I guess I just don’t understand contracts and laws. Your employment agreement can include stuff like “if you say anything bad about us, even to your family in your own home, you owe us $50,000”. What in the world?? I guess NDA’s are like that, and used everywhere. Still it just seems wild

Free speech on one hand, legal system capture on the other.

There's (perhaps unfortunately) nothing stopping you from signing away your freedom of speech.

Re: Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta

#20
Ordered a hard copy of the book, don't trust that an eBook version won't get revoked or edited at some point.

Timely given I just tried to sign into Meta for the first time in a year or two as I am being required to work on a Marketing API integration, got prompted for a video selfie(!) and my account is now in "Community Review" as maybe my expression was too grumpy about being required to present myself for inspection. Abhorrent company.

Post reply on HN