Live data from Hacker News

Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta

thetimes.com

1–10 of 615 posts

Re: Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta

#4
I'm going to place an order for the book right now. I encourage you all to do the same.

We the people hold the power to keep in check the immoral companies, governments, and other unscrupulous entities that would exploit the collective to enrich the few. And ultimately that's through our money and how we spend it.

Screw Meta and their anti-human business model.

Re: Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta

#5
I guess I just don’t understand contracts and laws. Your employment agreement can include stuff like “if you say anything bad about us, even to your family in your own home, you owe us $50,000”.

What in the world?? I guess NDA’s are like that, and used everywhere. Still it just seems wild

Re: Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta

#6
> The ruling, awarded without proper notice by an emergency arbitrator (a non-court mediator that is part of the American Arbitration Association), actually said nothing about the truth or otherwise of Sarah’s devastating claims in her book. It made no mention of defamation. Instead, it relied on a non-disparagement clause in her severance agreement with Facebook to silence her.

It's well past time to rein in arbitration.

It really should be treated like small claims court; only permissible up to a point. Once it's high-stakes enough, real courts should be in play.

Re: Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta

#7
“They were careless people, Tom and Daisy- they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made.” ― F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby

Re: Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta

#8

I guess I just don’t understand contracts and laws. Your employment agreement can include stuff like “if you say anything bad about us, even to your family in your own home, you owe us $50,000”. What in the world?? I guess NDA’s are like that, and used everywhere. Still it just seems wild

Ah, don't worry, we have a concept of "onerous clause doctrine" to help with that. Of course, it's almost entirely up to a judge's discretion what is and is not onerous, so...

Re: Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta

#9

I guess I just don’t understand contracts and laws. Your employment agreement can include stuff like “if you say anything bad about us, even to your family in your own home, you owe us $50,000”. What in the world?? I guess NDA’s are like that, and used everywhere. Still it just seems wild

Free speech on one hand, legal system capture on the other.

Re: Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta

#10
This book was SO GOOD.

It's bleak. I always imagined that rich/powerful people only created suffering if that suffering was required for certain goals. It's easier for me to bear injustice when it's a zero-sum game. But the story of Facebook is not that. Facebook didn't make ethical sacrifices for profit -- its executives just didn't care to understand the consequences of their actions. I wish those folks could feel how much harm they've caused.

Post reply on HN