Live data from Hacker News

Delve removed from Y Combinator

ycombinator.com

231–240 of 344 posts

Re: Delve removed from Y Combinator

#231

Interesting! I worked for one YC startup that committed blatant fraud, with the founders vanishing when investors started chasing them to bring them to responsibility. And they haven't been removed. Just marked as "inactive".

What one? There’s little risk of naming the startup.

Re: Delve removed from Y Combinator

#232
post #57
post #50

This other profile is still up: https://www.forbes.com/profile/delve/ 30U30 never ceases to amaze.

I wonder if the kind of personality that gets you on 30U30 correlates with being willing to engage in massive fraud, and being able to get away with it for a minute. Holmes, SBF, Shkreli, Charlie Javice, Ishan Wahi...

If I remember correctly, you need to be nominated by someone to be considered for the 30U30 list. Some of the people on those lists will literally run their own campaigns to get on the list, meaning that they'll pay people to nominate them, pay PR firms to run stories and campaigns. Other people do seemingly nothing, and just get nominated by legit people that admire them.

So, I'm fairly certain lists like that will attract some amount of unscrupulous narcissists.

Re: Delve removed from Y Combinator

#233
post #181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> YC has a lot to answer for in the damage it's wreaked over the years. What damage is that? (excluding the present case)

They’re responsible for the existence of scribd. Not aware of any other obviously socially net negative companies.

Flock

Re: Delve removed from Y Combinator

#234

Someone leaked an internal Bookface chat from Garry Tan (YC CEO) saying: We have asked Delve to leave YC. YC is a community, not just an accelerator. The founders in our community have to trust each other, and we have to trust them. When that trust breaks down, there's really only one thing to do. We're not going to get into the details publicly. We wish them well. https://x.com/___4o____/status/2040271468874076380 I…

"They've betrayed my trust but I wish them well" is an interesting statement.

“We’re keeping our distance but we still own a piece of their company” might have done it?

Re: Delve removed from Y Combinator

#235

Someone leaked an internal Bookface chat from Garry Tan (YC CEO) saying: We have asked Delve to leave YC. YC is a community, not just an accelerator. The founders in our community have to trust each other, and we have to trust them. When that trust breaks down, there's really only one thing to do. We're not going to get into the details publicly. We wish them well. https://x.com/___4o____/status/2040271468874076380 I…

"They've betrayed my trust but I wish them well" is an interesting statement.

Everyone one of us makes mistakes. Wish all well and see what the future brings.

Re: Delve removed from Y Combinator

#236
post #224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Who rapes and bombs schools full of U18 children.

That is just what the O18 want in there. Last one also got their role because that. Doing it in public on camera.

Speak for yourself. I'm O18 and I don't want him in there like you claim to. Most of his base claimed to be anti-pedo until they saw the evidence in the unredacted subset of the Epstein files that Congress legally forced him to release, and now suddenly they're pro-pedo (and pro-war and pro-bombing-schoolchildren). But you be you, and make baseless evidence-free false equivalence accusations against other people to justify the rapes and legally adjudicated sexual assault and pussy grabbing by the guy you as an "O18" claim you want in there.

Re: Delve removed from Y Combinator

#237
post #211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's precisely because they graduated 5000+ companies that fraud is more difficult to avoid. They scaled up massively the size of each batch and their frequency to a point where they are incapable of auditing them.

Maybe someone should start an auditing company for YC... oh

There is too much friction in the audit process… someone needs to solve this

Re: Delve removed from Y Combinator

#238

Having gone through the SOC2 process multiple times and having worked with and read SOC2 reports from many public companies, it's difficult for me to understand the outrage. The specific fraud allegations are bad (lying about US based auditors) but it's completely normal and common for soc2 reports to be templates with no company specific information. It would be unusual for reports to include anything about the spec…

There are typically two soc2 reports generated from an audit. The first is the one for general use, often just shared publicly. This is probably what you look at from public companies that you have no binding relationship with. The other is the restricted use report which details all the findings and controls. That is typically only shared under NDA.

Re: Delve removed from Y Combinator

#239

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They’re responsible for the existence of scribd. Not aware of any other obviously socially net negative companies.

Reddit

I think when making the claim a company is a net negative, it's necessary to explore what would have happened if the company hadn't been founded.

I find it unlikely, for example that there would not be a dominant centralized forum platform. People would have certainly started problematic communities on the dominant platform, and it's unlikely a platform with strict moderation would have gained dominance before 2015 or so. I do think a dominant player would have been established by 2015.

Do you think whatever you see as harmful about Reddit would not have occurred if the company didn't exist?

Re: Delve removed from Y Combinator

#240
post #34

I'm getting the impression that a lot of people in this thread think this is because they violated an open-source license and saying things to the effect of, "they're just the ones who got caught". I also thought that was the scandal initially. (And when it comes to license violations, yes, there's absolutely more where that came from.) But that's just the cherry on top. I don't think they're being thrown out because…

hipaa*
Post reply on HN