11–20 of 24 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
we’re going to have a bunch of CC rewritten in
Waiting for Rust.
Its worth following: https://github.com/instructkr/claw-code
[0]: my article: https://smileplease.mataroa.blog/blog/claw-code-reaches-100k...
Claude code written for basic on your Apple II, because it'd be so retro.
How much of this was written using / by Claude? Not hating or snarking, BTW, just curious. Why (especially if the answer above is 'yes' / 'most') do we collectively think Anthropic built such a heavy interface?
all of it, and I think the answer is 1. feature creep 2. a lot of nice-to-haves. the TUI alone is responsible for a lot of bloat
That sure is a lot of lines to avoid using getopts...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
all of it, and I think the answer is 1. feature creep 2. a lot of nice-to-haves. the TUI alone is responsible for a lot of bloat
Even that TUI is written in React.
Is there an engineering-based reason, or is it that the AI knows React, so it's easier to vibe, and damn the user experience?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Waiting for Rust.
Claw-code (reached 100k stars on github and I have made an article about them[0]) are currently re-writing claude-code in rust (they have already ported it to python) Its worth following: https://github.com/instructkr/claw-code [0]: my article: https://smileplease.mataroa.blog/blog/claw-code-reaches-100k...
The stars on the original claw-code repo were earned through the leak, not the work. Riding that wave with another clone doesn't make it original engineering.
Also worth noting: this wasn't submitted as Show HN — it's being promoted through comment threads instead. Make of that what you will.
Real open-source respects both the letter and the spirit of IP law.