Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
No. Stop putting words in my mouth.
We intercepted the White House app's network traffic
11–20 of 85 posts
Re: We intercepted the White House app's network traffic
#12So like... most b2c apps out there? I checked app privacy report for a few such apps I have installed and also got a very high proportion of third party domains. Maybe not as high as 77% but definitely above 50% (ie. more domains are third party than first party). The most surprising part here is them refusing to put correct info in the "data collected" section of the app store listing. edit: they seemed to have upda…
[flagged]
Re: We intercepted the White House app's network traffic
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
No. Stop putting words in my mouth.
Re: We intercepted the White House app's network traffic
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
No. Stop putting words in my mouth.
No one put words in your mouth, they asked you a question. You are the one who made the initial comparison to B2C apps, so it seems like a fair question to me. Your comment implies that its standard and the app isn't doing anything out of the ordinary when I think most people would except an official government app to be held to a higher standard than the average B2C app.
The relevant part of B2C is the 2C part, not the B. Mass market apps are generally ridden with telemetry and SDKs. Moreover I'm not sure how you think it's a "fair question" to go from a remark about how other apps are equally bad, to thinking I want the US government to operate as a business. It's like doing:
A: "I called the IRS and was put on hold for 2 hours, can you believe that?"
B: "To be fair that's the experience calling into most businesses, like banks or the cable company"
A: "Wow so you think we should be running the IRS like a bank?"
>I think most people would except an official government app to be held to a higher standard than the average B2C app.
Is this a "yes, in an ideal world that's how things should be" type of statement, or are you claiming "yes, government agencies have a track record of delivering technical excellence on software projects, and this particular project was especially bad"? The former is basically a meaningless platitude, and I don't think anyone seriously thinks the latter is true.
Re: We intercepted the White House app's network traffic
#15So like... most b2c apps out there? I checked app privacy report for a few such apps I have installed and also got a very high proportion of third party domains. Maybe not as high as 77% but definitely above 50% (ie. more domains are third party than first party). The most surprising part here is them refusing to put correct info in the "data collected" section of the app store listing. edit: they seemed to have upda…
Right, the White House is collecting data and sending it to Huawei, and overall collection rate is worse than any other app you’ve seen by a wide margin. That makes me net more surprised after reading your comment. You're not surprised the white house is worse than any other app you've seen by 20%?
???
Re: We intercepted the White House app's network traffic
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
Right, the White House is collecting data and sending it to Huawei, and overall collection rate is worse than any other app you’ve seen by a wide margin. That makes me net more surprised after reading your comment. You're not surprised the white house is worse than any other app you've seen by 20%?
>to Huawei ???
Re: We intercepted the White House app's network traffic
#17Re: We intercepted the White House app's network traffic
#18Re: We intercepted the White House app's network traffic
#19Re: We intercepted the White House app's network traffic
#20[flagged]
People should care.