601–610 of 1001 posts
They have an interesting regex for detecting negative sentiment in users prompt which is then logged (explicit content): https://github.com/chatgptprojects/claude-code/blob/642c7f94... I guess these words are to be avoided...
They have an interesting regex for detecting negative sentiment in users prompt which is then logged (explicit content): https://github.com/chatgptprojects/claude-code/blob/642c7f94... I guess these words are to be avoided...
An LLM company using regexes for sentiment analysis? That's like a truck company using horses to transport parts. Weird choice.
They have an interesting regex for detecting negative sentiment in users prompt which is then logged (explicit content): https://github.com/chatgptprojects/claude-code/blob/642c7f94... I guess these words are to be avoided...
I've been wondering if all of these companies have some system for flagging upset responses. Those cases seem like they are far more likely than average to point to weaknesses in the model and/or potentially dangerous situations.
Undercover mode also pretends to be human, which I'm less ok with: https://github.com/chatgptprojects/claude-code/blob/642c7f94...
You'll never win this battle, so why waste feelings and energy on it? That's where the internet is headed. There's no magical human verification technology coming to save us.
I think this is ultimately caused by a Bun bug which I reported, which means source maps are exposed in production: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/28001 Claude code uses (and Anthropic owns) Bun, so my guess is they're doing a production build, expecting it not to output source maps, but it is.
Open Claude Code? Better than OpenCode and Codex
Today being March 31st, is this a genuine issue or just perfectly timed April Fools noise? What do you think?
I think this is ultimately caused by a Bun bug which I reported, which means source maps are exposed in production: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/28001 Claude code uses (and Anthropic owns) Bun, so my guess is they're doing a production build, expecting it not to output source maps, but it is.
Open Claude Code? Better than OpenCode and Codex
Claude Code is clearly a pile of vibe-coded garbage. The UI is janky and jumps all over the place, especially during longer sessions. (Which also have a several second delay to render. In a terminal).
Lately, it's been crashing if I hold the Backspace key down for too long.
Being open-source would be the best thing to happen to them. At least they would finally get a pair of human eyes looking at their codebase.
Claude is amazing, but the people at Anthropic make some insane decisions, including trying (and failing, apparently) to keep Claude Code a closed-source application.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
An LLM company using regexes for sentiment analysis? That's like a truck company using horses to transport parts. Weird choice.
The difference in response time - especially versus a regex running locally - is really difficult to express to someone who hasn't made much use of LLM calls in their natural language projects. Someone said 10,000x slower, but that's off - in my experience - by about four orders of magnitude. And that's average, it gets much worse. Now personally I would have maybe made a call through a "traditional" ML widget (sciki…