21–30 of 1001 posts
The code looks, at a glance, as bad as you expect.
Can you give an example? Looks fairly decent to me
1. Randomly peeking at process.argv and process.env all around. Other weird layering violations, too.
2. Tons of repeat code, eg. multiple ad-hoc implementations of hash functions / PRNGs.
3. Almost no high-level comments about structure - I assume all that lives in some CLAUDE.md instead.Would be interesting to run this through Malus [1] or literally just Claude Code and get open source Claude Code out of it. I jest, but in a world where these models have been trained on gigatons of open source I don't even see the moral problem. IANAL, don't actually do this. https://malus.sh/
The problem is the oauth and their stance on bypassing that. You'd want to use your subscription, and they probably can detect that and ban users. They hold all the power there.
Would be interesting to run this through Malus [1] or literally just Claude Code and get open source Claude Code out of it. I jest, but in a world where these models have been trained on gigatons of open source I don't even see the moral problem. IANAL, don't actually do this. https://malus.sh/
The problem is the oauth and their stance on bypassing that. You'd want to use your subscription, and they probably can detect that and ban users. They hold all the power there.
There were/are a lot of discussions on how the harness can affect the output.
Isn't it open source? Or is there an open source front-end and a closed backend?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you give an example? Looks fairly decent to me
the "useCanUseTool.tsx" hook, is definitely something I would hate seeing in any code base I come across. It's extremely nested, it's basically an if statement soup `useTypeahead.tsx` is even worse, extremely nested, a ton of "if else" statements, I doubt you'd look at it and think this is sane code
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you give an example? Looks fairly decent to me
1. Randomly peeking at process.argv and process.env all around. Other weird layering violations, too. 2. Tons of repeat code, eg. multiple ad-hoc implementations of hash functions / PRNGs. 3. Almost no high-level comments about structure - I assume all that lives in some CLAUDE.md instead.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
the "useCanUseTool.tsx" hook, is definitely something I would hate seeing in any code base I come across. It's extremely nested, it's basically an if statement soup `useTypeahead.tsx` is even worse, extremely nested, a ton of "if else" statements, I doubt you'd look at it and think this is sane code
useCanUseTool.tsx looks special, maybe it'scodegen'ed or copy 'n pasted? `_c` as an import name, no comments, use of promises instead of async function. Or maybe it's just bad vibing...
But if you take a look at the other file, for example `useTypeahead` you'd see, even if there are a few code-gen / source-map artifacts, you still see the core logic, and behavior, is just a big bowl of soup