Live data from Hacker News

“CEO said a thing” journalism

karlbode.com

1–10 of 81 posts

Re: “CEO said a thing” journalism

#4
It is at least entertaining when certain CEOs speak off-the-cuff and reveal they have no clue what they are talking about.

Jensen thinks DLSS 5 works at "the geometry level", for instance. Oh and he pays engineers $500,000 to spend $250,000 on Claude tokens.

Re: “CEO said a thing” journalism

#5
I'm confident this phenomenon exists in other industries too.

Is there a term that's equivalent to "reactionary" but applies to leftist/liberal ideals or is it fine for me to start referring to this kind of writing as "reactionary" save that I apply some sort of qualifier like "leftist" or "liberal" before or afterwards?

Re: “CEO said a thing” journalism

#8

I'm confident this phenomenon exists in other industries too. Is there a term that's equivalent to "reactionary" but applies to leftist/liberal ideals or is it fine for me to start referring to this kind of writing as "reactionary" save that I apply some sort of qualifier like "leftist" or "liberal" before or afterwards?

im not sure what about this makes it left reactionary but I suppose left reactionary would be the term

Re: “CEO said a thing” journalism

#9

It is at least entertaining when certain CEOs speak off-the-cuff and reveal they have no clue what they are talking about. Jensen thinks DLSS 5 works at "the geometry level", for instance. Oh and he pays engineers $500,000 to spend $250,000 on Claude tokens.

It doesn't reveal that they have no clue of what they're talking about. They know that a good number of idiot CEOs will hear this and dictate their engineers spend more claude/codex money, which benefits them.

Jensen isn't an idiot, he's capitalizing on the market.

Re: “CEO said a thing” journalism

#10

I'm confident this phenomenon exists in other industries too. Is there a term that's equivalent to "reactionary" but applies to leftist/liberal ideals or is it fine for me to start referring to this kind of writing as "reactionary" save that I apply some sort of qualifier like "leftist" or "liberal" before or afterwards?

I fail to see any connections between this piece and Reaction, even tenuous ones.

Also, what would define a "leftist reactionary" anyway? An opposition to social conservatism? That's already the left's stance.

> is it fine for me to start referring to this kind of writing as "reactionary"

I really don't understand what's wrong with asking journalists to do their damn jobs and spend even a tiny amount of time checking the validity of what the people they're quoting are saying. Don't remove their statement, just point at the various potential ways they're misleading/wrong.

Journalists better start doing this basic part of their job again lest you want to be ruled by shameless incompetent buffoons that go unchallenged. Oh wait...

Post reply on HN