Live data from Hacker News

LinkedIn uses 2.4 GB RAM across two tabs

news.ycombinator.com

161–170 of 481 posts

Re: LinkedIn uses 2.4 GB RAM across two tabs

#161

I don't understand who uses that network anymore. Everytime I login it's all ai generated stories next to ai generated flavor images of people sounding like a parody of themselves ("what taking my kids to school taught me about business scaling"). Out of all places to doomscroll, why choose the one that feels like an episode of Severance?

> Out of all places to doomscroll

Doomscrolling is on you, other people use the resume and jobs parts?

Re: LinkedIn uses 2.4 GB RAM across two tabs

#162
post #152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

LOL you've nailed LinkedinSpeak here

[flagged]

This can be read as why to avoid LinkedIn. Job searching is already hard, if you manage to land an interview you still have to spend time, as an old dude, studying Leetcode like you're a kid with five years experience instead of twenty. Then it's competitive. Etc.

So to this you wish to add the increased risk of negative exposure by saying a bad thing? Or that someone, someones, or people five years from today consider a bad thing?

I love writing and posting and engaging (you can tell from my history here alone), but I'm not crazy enough to risk spilling my feelings on a site full of people in suits and ties, with Leader next to their names.

Re: LinkedIn uses 2.4 GB RAM across two tabs

#163
post #152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Oh, you were not joking. No, people do not care. You're not a celeb. This is textbook spotlight effect. Your life becomes a lot more enjoyable if you don't take yourself so serious, try it sometime

[flagged]

Re: LinkedIn uses 2.4 GB RAM across two tabs

#164
post #152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

This can be read as why to avoid LinkedIn. Job searching is already hard, if you manage to land an interview you still have to spend time, as an old dude, studying Leetcode like you're a kid with five years experience instead of twenty. Then it's competitive. Etc. So to this you wish to add the increased risk of negative exposure by saying a bad thing? Or that someone, someones, or people five years from today consid…

[flagged]

Re: LinkedIn uses 2.4 GB RAM across two tabs

#165

I don't understand who uses that network anymore. Everytime I login it's all ai generated stories next to ai generated flavor images of people sounding like a parody of themselves ("what taking my kids to school taught me about business scaling"). Out of all places to doomscroll, why choose the one that feels like an episode of Severance?

I use LinkedIn. I’ve posted some blog posts on both Hacker News and LinkedIn and determined that LinkedIn is a bit more evergreen. A post on the HN front page gets thousands or tens of thousands of views in a day but a LinkedIn post has thousands in the long tail.

I think a lot of accounts are playing the algorithm and have AI generate a post every week. I just ignore those. Most of my posts are one sentence followed by a link to a blog.

Truthfully, I think it’s easy to rise above the slop since so much of it talks about the same stuff in the same format.

Re: LinkedIn uses 2.4 GB RAM across two tabs

#167
post #27
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Imagine the MBA that had this idea. This is peak, distilled Microslop engineering right there.

It's the user's fault. They vote for this crap with their attention. Junk sites like this shouldn't exist but they do amd aren't going anywhere until people stop using them.

Users are not perfect agents. How can you expect the average non-technical person to figure out what is happening? For most people, if they don't see visually see something happening on the screen, it doesn't exist. They simply have no frame of reference to figure out that LinkedIN is hijacking their scroll speed.

Re: LinkedIn uses 2.4 GB RAM across two tabs

#168

I don't understand who uses that network anymore. Everytime I login it's all ai generated stories next to ai generated flavor images of people sounding like a parody of themselves ("what taking my kids to school taught me about business scaling"). Out of all places to doomscroll, why choose the one that feels like an episode of Severance?

Very few people with LinkedIn profiles read the social feed. Even fewer post things to it.

The majority use LinkedIn only for job searching and keeping contacts.

I do some times wonder if any hiring managers see a lot of LinkedIn social post activity as a positive thing. The few times we’ve interviewed candidates who had a lot of LinkedIn posting activity it was considered a risk: We could go through their LinkedIn activity and see that they must have been spending hours posturing on LinkedIn and replying to people everyday during the work day, which looks like a big distraction when they’re doing it constantly.

Re: LinkedIn uses 2.4 GB RAM across two tabs

#169
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I got my last job there, and I have a steady queue of recruiters reaching out the whole time. So I will probably continue to use it as long as I need to eat. I don't engage with the feed at all though. I believe the same applies to many others as well

I've also gotten my last few jobs there. It's great for that. Even if it's 90% low effort recruiter spam. It's also full of "greatest team in the world", pizza parties, "incredible" training sessions, and "meetings of great minds". And now it's turned into a bunch of comedy reels. Blah.

You forgot "I am honoured and humbled to announce ."

Re: LinkedIn uses 2.4 GB RAM across two tabs

#170

I wonder how much of that is from Linkedin checking what browser extensions you have, probably desperately trying to prevent screen scraping? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46904361

That code is minimal. It’s definitely not the source.

Given all the sales and recruiting spam I get, I think it’s a good thing that LinkedIn is making efforts to detect people using garbage plugins that scrape data and send it to their servers or prepare it for mass spamming.

Post reply on HN