Show HN: I built an OS that is pure AI
11–20 of 55 posts
Re: Show HN: I built an OS that is pure AI
#12> Currently it runs as a desktop app on Linux, macOS, and Windows Does that mean it's not actually an OS?
Re: Show HN: I built an OS that is pure AI
#13One critique is that I think it might be more efficient to just make use of existing software for some of these things rather than generate them on the fly (for something for example like a text editor), but I guess that will depend on how costly it is to run AI programs in the future (if it becomes much cheaper, then I could see your concept being taken up by more people)
Re: Show HN: I built an OS that is pure AI
#14> the UX For this to be practical you really need to build things iteratively and asking the user questions, rather than attempting at one shot half assed ideas Also most people are better explaining details with voice rather than text.
Re: Show HN: I built an OS that is pure AI
#15How did you solve the problem of hallucinations?
Re: Show HN: I built an OS that is pure AI
#16I think this is the way things are ultimately going (software as ephemerally generated based on your preferences), but at the moment, I can't see myself using these generated apps. Maybe it's just an aesthetic thing—have you experimented with personalized theming?
Re: Show HN: I built an OS that is pure AI
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks! Playbit is a cool project, I've followed it. The key difference with Pneuma is that the programs themselves are AI-generated at runtime. There's no toolchain the user interacts with, no editor, no compiler invocation. You describe what you want and the system handles everything from code generation through compilation to execution in one pass. Yansu is interesting too but it's a web app builder. Pneuma runs n…
That makes sense—I think it's really interesting to see the possibilities of new software created purely by AI! I'm happy to offer feedback, my email is micah.blachman@gmail.com
Re: Show HN: I built an OS that is pure AI
#18However, I'd never use it. Reason: having everything dynamically created JIT means there's a trade-off somewhere else; in this case, it's energy consumption. I'd rather "cache" applications (ie. have them as installable software, which has been built just once) than endlessly recreate software from scratch each time, with all the energy usage that entails.
Re: Show HN: I built an OS that is pure AI
#19Building apps on the fly seems cool, But hits the frustration when they don't work at times, When building as a side project we tolerate it because we are in building phase, But when using we might not tolerate the issues.
Finally the security also plays a major role, So instead of building apps at runtime, We need agents and skills as portable objects.
Re: Show HN: I built an OS that is pure AI
#20How did you solve the problem of hallucinations?
I've built a list of common gotchas in the generation prompts. Also if the compilation fails it falls back to opus with the error message and code and can try again twice.