I think French laws have been on website that’s like that for a while
Looks like it's been abandoned, though. :(
21–30 of 246 posts
I think French laws have been on website that’s like that for a while
Looks like it's been abandoned, though. :(
I'll take a look at data to enrich it :).
This is brilliant. I wish this were available for all legislations. There's so many inefficiencies that are trivially solved with existing tech frameworks.
This is great. Compare it to British legislation which is frankly a mess of patches. Example picked fairly much at random, this law was originally passed in 1990 and has been "patched" regularly: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/18/section/9 Laws being passed are these ludicrous sets of patches: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/9/part/1
This is brilliant. I wish this were available for all legislations. There's so many inefficiencies that are trivially solved with existing tech frameworks.
Out of curiosity, like what specifically?
Didn’t DOGE’s failure highlight that it actually wasn’t trivial? I’m skeptical at first glance but open to being proven wrong.
I'm sure I won't be the only one curious, please enlighten me.
[1]: https://github.com/EnriqueLop/legalize-es/commit/424cbc96507...>
This is brilliant. I wish this were available for all legislations. There's so many inefficiencies that are trivially solved with existing tech frameworks.
This is brilliant. I wish this were available for all legislations. There's so many inefficiencies that are trivially solved with existing tech frameworks.
> There's so many inefficiencies that are trivially solved with existing tech frameworks. There really, really are. The legal industry is well aware of that fact - and how many billable hours they stand to lose by making their work more efficient and understandable. You know how tax prep companies spent over $90m 'lobbying' Congress to ensure that filing your taxes remains difficult and complicated [0]? Well, lawyers…