Live data from Hacker News

Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

reuters.com

371–380 of 591 posts

Re: Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

#371
post #298

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're missing some key distinctions. The issues are: 1) putting classified information into a non-classified system; 2) putting information that needs to be preserved under laws like the presidential records act into systems where it's set to be auto-deleted. Both are illegal. Simply saying that the Biden administration pre-installed Signal is irrelevant. There are legitimate uses. Your own article makes this exact…

> This has nothing to do with adding the wrong contacts. It has to do with putting highly-sensitive material into Signal to circumvent the law around records preservation My comment above already mentions public records of the DoD contracting out archiving of the Signal chat, so it doesn't in fact circumvent laws around preservation. > You're doing bullshit partisan whataboutism. "well the democrats did it first". I…

I'm not clear on the verdict here.

1. Classified information. Was it legal to put that into the DoD approved Signal build? The media coverage at the time gave me the impression that it was not.

2. Records keeping. Were the Trump admin chats in question properly archived then? I had been led to believe that they weren't. Do you believe that to be incorrect?

> I don't blame the Biden DoD for experimenting down that road at all

The person you're replying to never criticized them for such.

Re: Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

#372
This is quite misleading and partisan to present this as "FBI director's personal email" when the emails far predate his current role.

If I had downloaded those emails, which I haven't because I know of no website that archives the internet, and if I had read them, which I haven't because that would be a breach of someone's privacy, then certainly I would have figured out that it contains no spicy state secrets. But why spend one hour assessing an information when you can get clicks by suggesting something bigger?

Those supposedly Iranian hackers surely know how to hack the western media to get attention.

I found it actually more informative to read on the sad history of the Dena, the ship whose victims this leak was dedicated to, so it's not been a complete waste of time.

Re: Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

#373
post #217

It’s all fine since he didn’t use it for official business right, right…

Based on the links in the articles, it's personal photographs and a resume from an old Gmail account. The resume dates from 2017.

If they got into the account they got everything. The publicly released pictures are more of a taunt meant to publicly signal that he’s fucked. I would bet (figuratively) that anyrhing of actual value is either being sold or leveraged. After all this is a man that has shown an almost infinite capacity for humiliation.

Re: Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

#374

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It always will be. The FBI is scandal prone and a stranger to success. I'm not entirely sure a large federal apparatus is needed anymore. It maybe made sense when local police were poorly trained and psychics were seen as credible investigative tools, but, I think we're well past that. I think it should be chopped into 50 pieces and handed over to the states to operate. A small coordinating office is all that should…

Username checks out, I guess! Seriously though I'm not so sanguine about local forces. Assuming the local PD is well trained seems like a big if, to say nothing of the risk of localized pressure or corruption. Eg would the local sheriff of a county with a very large employer be able to effectively investigate and bring charges against it? Being able to bring in federal LE brings a certain impartiality to those sorts…

With FOIA and Body Worn Cameras I think we're in far better position to demand accountability from local police and sheriffs. Two tools the FBI are not compelled to comply with or deploy and which many state police agencies also resist using.

In any case I think you'd want to remove their enforcement mandate and instead refocus them on information gathering and rapid secure distribution, tailored forensic investigations, and on creating, monitoring and refining police best practices and training programs.

Re: Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

#375
post #363

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Russia is totalitarian today. It's really not. There is no ideology. There are no mass rallies in support of the government. No official sets of books, there's no "My Struggle" by Putin that everyone in the country needs to have. > That is the point. In a contrast to being just a kleptocracy for the first ~15 years of Putin, Russia does have such an ideology at the state level today - "Russian world" Not really. It…

>There are no mass rallies in support of the government. for example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzaoHPWfkbE >No official sets of books, new unified history textbook. The "Talks about Important" school ideology lessons. Putin's propaganda article on Ukraine history (of course no relation to real history). >It's really not. There is no ideology. the foundational ideology of a fascist state is "interests of state t…

> for example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzaoHPWfkbE

That was electoral event with mandatory presence. This is nothing like Stalin's rallies where people themselves organized and attended, e.g.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eC6bzBTmmhU

> new unified history textbook. The "Talks about Important" school ideology lessons. Putin's propaganda article on Ukraine history (of course no relation to real history).

Yup. They are _trying_ but without at least semi-coherent ideology, it just looks comical. I suggest reading that textbook, it's just trash. It's badly written and is just a collection of unconnected facts. All it can teach is the late USSR norm: "Say what they want to hear, think what you want, and do what you actually need to do".

There can be no ideology in an authoritarian state, ideology binds the leadership. Khomeini in Iran can't just go to a gay party or eat during Ramadan. Putin (and his ilk like Maduro) does not want to get limited in any way.

> the foundational ideology of a fascist state is "interests of state trump any and all rights/freedoms/interests of an individual"

If you want to talk about fine details of political science, then fascism is not necessarily totalitarian. It can be practiced in a far-right authoritarian state. Nazism is indeed different, and it _is_ a totalitarian ideology.

Nazism had its foundational work ("Mein Kampf") and a doctrine fortified by a set of "scientific" proofs of German superiority. And they had plenty of true believers, including the actual core of the Nazi party. It also imposed binding restrictions on everyone. For example, nobody in the Nazi party could (openly) marry a Jewish person and expect to stay in power.

Putin doesn't want any of this. He loves that one day the US is the enemy number one for him, and the next day Trump is his best friend.

> The state TV openly talks about "Ukrainess" being a brain decease needing eradication (reminds a lot how "Jewishness" was talked about back then in Germany).

Yes, and these TV channels now have less popularity than gardening channels. This is another point of difference. In a totalitarian state, the ideology must be, well, _total_ and omnipresent.

The Russian government is trying to make sure the war stays as invisible as possible. Try to find any mentions of it here: https://yandex.com/maps/-/CPVwbS-t

> It definitely lost any chance of being even remotely comical when they actually declared and started that eradication in 2022.

Unfortunately, you don't need ideology to wage wars.

> State ideology never requires true believers.

It does. And that is the true difference. A significant part of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in Iran really sincerely believes that they're fighting for Islam. It's not _just_ a way for them to get into power to run protection rackets.

Re: Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

#376

Link if you want to look: https://bsky.app/profile/ddosecrets.org/post/3mi2iokglyn2w

Is it legal to download something like this?

Of course it's allowed. The gov will happily steal and buy all of your info. No problem to have it done to them.

Re: Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

#377

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>The people of the US were converted into functional Putin-subservient Russians It's crazy that you continue to push this narrative despite the entire "Russia-Gate" thing turning out to total bullshit oppo followed by Trump being currently at war with one of Putin's allies and having jailed another. The evidence supporting this claim is what, he wasn't nice to Zelenskyy that one time (despite still financially suppor…

The Russians certainly did interfere in the 2016 election. It was not bullshit.

Define "interfere". Be specific.

Re: Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

#378

Link if you want to look: https://bsky.app/profile/ddosecrets.org/post/3mi2iokglyn2w

While it's appreciated, that isn't the original link and Ddos "secrets" gate keeps info to people they personally allow. The person who runs it also has been to court for a name change, citing something along the lines of wanting to work in intelligence.

Not a source I would trust unless there is no other option to get the dumps or leaks.

Real link from Handala (dead): https://handala-team.to/kash-patel-current-director-of-the-f...

Archive: https://archive.ph/ILFFH

Download: https://link.storjshare.io/raw/jxoxwyp7qosgdwldereecudqpbva/...

Password: handala

Post reply on HN