Is this sarcasm? If not, I wonder why.
Don't Wait for Claude
11–20 of 67 posts
Re: Don't Wait for Claude
#12Don't really agree, in my experience the switching context is extremely costly. I personally have trouble having even a couple of sessions running in parallel,Especially when I'm talking difficult hard to solve problems. Of course it's easy for trivial jobs, but it's not always the case. I have been much more successful in making my time worth by taking a look at the model's output and actively participating.It gives…
There's a lot more "telling" than "showing" going on. By that I mean - the people claiming hyper-productivity from their GasTown setup never have actual products to demo.
Re: Don't Wait for Claude
#13If you are letting Claude run for seven minutes at a time, you aren't thinking hard enough about what you're building. If you start trying to juggle multiple agents, you are doubling down on the wrong strategy. https://hbr.org/2010/12/you-cant-multi-task-so-stop-tr
Re: Don't Wait for Claude
#14Re: Don't Wait for Claude
#15I wonder what people think about this. I know there is a class of SWE/dev who now consider oneself as "the manager of agents". Good luck to them and articles like this would work for these people.
I'm not there yet and I hope I don't have to. I'm not a LLM and my mental model is (I believe) more than a markdown. But I haven't figured out the mental model that works for me, still staring at the terminal Claude blinking the cursor, sticking to "don't multitask" dogma.
Re: Don't Wait for Claude
#16Re: Don't Wait for Claude
#17When computer works, it's sword fighting time. I don't make the rules
Re: Don't Wait for Claude
#18Re: Don't Wait for Claude
#19Re: Don't Wait for Claude
#20Very painful to read.