Live data from Hacker News

The 'paperwork flood': How I drowned a bureaucrat before dinner

sightlessscribbles.com

11–20 of 510 posts

Re: The 'paperwork flood': How I drowned a bureaucrat before dinner

#13
post #6

I’m impressed the author was able to learn and handle all the UI while blind. The corner of “just works” computing they live in could be beyond what I’ve ever experienced.

it's fiction (seemingly everything is on the site?). maybe the title should reflect that

[deleted]

Re: The 'paperwork flood': How I drowned a bureaucrat before dinner

#14
post #6

I’m impressed the author was able to learn and handle all the UI while blind. The corner of “just works” computing they live in could be beyond what I’ve ever experienced.

it's fiction (seemingly everything is on the site?). maybe the title should reflect that

It's tagged nonfiction.

Re: The 'paperwork flood': How I drowned a bureaucrat before dinner

#16

The fax machine we had in the office would convert the incoming faxes to email for us. Maybe that's a security violation for them but I find it difficult to believe they don't have some sort of all digital receipt system

Yeah, there are also business that provide this as a service.

Re: The 'paperwork flood': How I drowned a bureaucrat before dinner

#17
Fictional, but how far away from the truth? I enjoyed this interview with the CIO of the IRS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4odAXoqRT8 who describes his troubles with replacing the fax based system. Security is mentioned. The specific section is around minute 15.

Re: The 'paperwork flood': How I drowned a bureaucrat before dinner

#18
Sounds like it's not real but...

It reads like an indictment of the government employee personally, rather than the rules and constraints that employee is forced to use.

Probably fair to comment on the interaction, whether the person was rude, and so on. But blaming them for not accepting email is kind of silly. They are not empowered to do that kind of thing.

Re: The 'paperwork flood': How I drowned a bureaucrat before dinner

#19
post #18

Sounds like it's not real but... It reads like an indictment of the government employee personally, rather than the rules and constraints that employee is forced to use. Probably fair to comment on the interaction, whether the person was rude, and so on. But blaming them for not accepting email is kind of silly. They are not empowered to do that kind of thing.

The person is an agent of the system. That they bear the brunt of the reaction is the system working as intended.
Post reply on HN