Agent-to-agent pair programming
21–30 of 78 posts
Re: Agent-to-agent pair programming
#22Re: Agent-to-agent pair programming
#23Re: Agent-to-agent pair programming
#24Re: Agent-to-agent pair programming
#25Re: Agent-to-agent pair programming
#26This is interesting for code, but I'm curious about agent-to-agent coordination for ops tasks — like one agent detecting a database anomaly and another auto-remediating it
The interesting thing here is agents working together to be better at a single task. Not agents integrated in a workflow. There's a lot of opportunity in "if this then that" scenarios that has nothing to do with two agents communicating on one single element of a problem, it's just Agent detect -> agent solve (-> Agent review? Agent deploy? Etc.)
Re: Agent-to-agent pair programming
#27I’m curious whether anyone has measured this systematically. Right now most of the evidence for multi-agent setups still feels anecdotal.
Re: Agent-to-agent pair programming
#28Re: Agent-to-agent pair programming
#29Re: Agent-to-agent pair programming
#30Nice - I do something similar in a semi manual way. I do find Codex very good at reviewing work marked as completed by Claude, especially when I get Claude to write up its work with a why,where & how doc. It’s very rare Claude has fully completed the task successfully and Codex doesn’t find issues.