End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
11–20 of 324 posts
Re: End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
#12I would say "end of chat control, for now"
Re: End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
#13Re: End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
#14Re: End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
#15Re: End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
#16Did that vote pass with a difference of one single vote? Tight squeeze there.
Re: End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
#17Did that vote pass with a difference of one single vote? Tight squeeze there.
Less tight.
Re: End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
#18Nice to see that democracy can work
> Nice to see that democracy can work Did it work? One political party (EPP) didn't like the result of the previous vote and so they forced a re-vote. > After the European Parliament had already rejected the indiscriminate and blanket Chat Control by US tech companies on 13 March, conservative forces attempted a democratically highly questionable maneuver yesterday to force a repeat vote to extend the law anyway. htt…
Re: End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
#19This is sad that this has gotten this far. If they wanted to pass a law to blow up citizens, do you think European Parliament would seriously consider it? It is exactly the same calibre of idiocy.
I would expect German authorities to issue arrest warrants and properly investigate this.
For context:
If terrorism is defined as using violence or threats to intimidate a population for political or ideological ends, then “Chat Control” qualifies in substance. Violence doesn’t have to leave blood. Psychological and coercive violence is recognised in domestic law (see coercive control offences) and by the WHO. It causes measurable harm to bodies and minds.
The aim is intimidation. The whole purpose is to make people too scared to speak freely. That is intimidation of a population, by design.
It is ideological. The ideology is mass control - keeping people compliant by stripping them of private spaces to think, talk, and dissent.
The only reason it’s not “terrorism” on paper is because states write definitions that exempt themselves. But in plain terms, the act is indistinguishable in effect from terrorism: deliberate fear, coercion, and the destruction of free will.
Re: End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Nice to see that democracy can work Did it work? One political party (EPP) didn't like the result of the previous vote and so they forced a re-vote. > After the European Parliament had already rejected the indiscriminate and blanket Chat Control by US tech companies on 13 March, conservative forces attempted a democratically highly questionable maneuver yesterday to force a repeat vote to extend the law anyway. htt…
Note that European parliament parties aren't particularly cohesive; some EPP members voted against it.
20 out of 184