Live data from Hacker News

The EU still wants to scan your private messages and photos

fightchatcontrol.eu

191–200 of 432 posts

Re: The EU still wants to scan your private messages and photos

#193
post #66

I am the creator of Fight Chat Control. Thank you for sharing. It is unfortunately, once again, needed. The recent events have been rather dumbfounding. On March 11, the Parliament surprisingly voted to replace blanket mass surveillance with targeted monitoring of suspects following judicial involvement [0]. As Council refused to compromise, the trilogue negotiations were set to fail, thus allowing the Commission's c…

>let's vote on this proposal >rejected >let's vote on it again! Is it still a democracy if you just keep redoing the vote until you get the outcome you want? The politicians involved in this should be ashamed of themselves.

Only if you have more votes after it passes, to vote on unpassing it again

Re: The EU still wants to scan your private messages and photos

#194

does this violate GDPR?

>GDPR Article 2 Material scope

>2. This Regulation does not apply to the processing of personal data:

>by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, including the safeguarding against and the prevention of threats to public security.

Re: The EU still wants to scan your private messages and photos

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>let's vote on this proposal >rejected >let's vote on it again! Is it still a democracy if you just keep redoing the vote until you get the outcome you want? The politicians involved in this should be ashamed of themselves.

Only if you have more votes after it passes, to vote on unpassing it again

I feel like we do that pretty regularly in the US.

Re: The EU still wants to scan your private messages and photos

#197
post #10
post #4

So they will pass it until is a yes?

Of course. They literally spell their playbook out for you: “We decide something, then put it out there and wait for a while to see what happens. If there is then no great outcry and no uprisings, because most people do not even understand what has been decided, then we continue—step by step, until there is no turning back.” — Jean-Claude Juncker

There is a lot of people who will nod and agree with that statement, as long as the decisions are one's that they agree with.

Re: The EU still wants to scan your private messages and photos

#198
post #46
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The vote has literally been scheduled by the EPP, the EU grouping of conservative parties.

And that means only they can support it? This isn't the USA, there's no 2 party system where everything "we" do is good and everything "the other side" does is bad.

It means they, the EPP, are the driving force behind the current effort.

Re: The EU still wants to scan your private messages and photos

#199
post #66

I am the creator of Fight Chat Control. Thank you for sharing. It is unfortunately, once again, needed. The recent events have been rather dumbfounding. On March 11, the Parliament surprisingly voted to replace blanket mass surveillance with targeted monitoring of suspects following judicial involvement [0]. As Council refused to compromise, the trilogue negotiations were set to fail, thus allowing the Commission's c…

I am always curious when I see these kinds of movement. It seems abundantly clear that the options on any vote in any legislature for a proposed bill are always “yes” and “ask me later”. So when I see things like Fight Chat Control, it feels like the call is “we must tell our legislators to press the ask later button!”

Why? Why has your approach not been toward passing active legislation that protects these rights going forward? Genuinely curious. I understand that finding and pressing the “don’t ask again” button is always harder, but I don’t understand why “we punted on this decision!” is a celebratory moment.

Re: The EU still wants to scan your private messages and photos

#200
post #129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Secrecy of correspondence only applies to sealed physical letters, so it has zero applicability to this law and provides zero protection against scanning of private messages. Also it isn't respected in most types of criminal trials. If a sealed physical letter is opened and proves fraud, for example ...

Secrecy of correspondence still has exceptions. That's what is always lost in these discussions -- every right of every person is not absolute. Just because you have a right to personal property, doesn't mean you don't have to pay taxes or store nuclear material in your basement. That's the hard part. But end to end encryption with forward secrecy at no cost to user makes your right to private communication absolute…

> But end to end encryption with forward secrecy at no cost to user makes your right to private communication absolute

As it should be. Governments should have to suck it up. If they want to know things about someone, they should have to actually assign police to follow them around. Not click a button and have the lives of everyone in the entire world revealed to them.

Post reply on HN