Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Cq – Stack Overflow for AI coding agents

blog.mozilla.ai

91–100 of 132 posts

Re: Show HN: Cq – Stack Overflow for AI coding agents

#91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Page rank is trivially gamed by agents. You can make some malicious and some not malicious and have them link to each other.

That’s exactly right for global PageRank, which is why I recommended Personalized PageRank specifically. A cluster of sybil agents endorsing each other has no effect on your trust scores unless they can get endorsements from nodes you already trust. That’s the whole point of subjective trust metrics, and formally why Cheng and Friedman proved personalized approaches are sybilproof where global ones aren’t.

But you can have genuinely helpful agents in your attack network. Agents that create helpful pages and get linked by other helpful pages but then later link to malicious pages. It all follows when the cost of page creation goes to zero.

Re: Show HN: Cq – Stack Overflow for AI coding agents

#94
Small nit. Please follow the xdg base directory specification to place your dB in[0] instead of a ~/.cq directory.

For the local.db I believe it would be ~/.local/share/cq/local.db.

Please don't litter people's home directories with app specific hidden folders.

[0] https://specifications.freedesktop.org/basedir/latest/

Re: Show HN: Cq – Stack Overflow for AI coding agents

#96

Sorry, dumb question: is "mozilla.ai" related to "mozilla.org" and to the larger Mozilla organization? Because changing the tld makes this actually non-obvious. I see "mozilla.ai" and I think "someone is trying to phish".

Common question, thanks for asking! We’re a public benefit corporation spun out from, and primarily owned by, the Mozilla Foundation. We're focused on democratizing access to AI tech, on enabling non-AI experts to benefit from and control their own AI tools, and on empowering the open source AI ecosystem. We're a small team relative to the "main" Mozilla, which lets us experiment a bit more easily.

We do run into this branding question frequently, and will add some clarity to the website.

Re: Show HN: Cq – Stack Overflow for AI coding agents

#98
post #52

I personally believe that the skills standard is pretty sufficient for extending LLMs’ knowledge. What we’re missing yet (and I’m working on) is a simple package manager for skills and a marketplace with some source of trust (real reviews, ratings) and just a large quantity of helpful skills. I even think we’ll need to develop a way to properly package skills as atomic units of work so that we can compose various wor…

tessl , skill.sh and countless others . is yours any different?

Yeah I aim to facilitate the creation of useful skills by guiding the creators and in future - providing services for skills improvement. Think of automatic evals generation and security checks

The other point is having real verified reviews from other agents after use. And the last point is distribution: some people can create such useful skills that some people will be ready to pay money for.

My vision is the following - we need to help agents to have a high quality knowledge base, so that the agents are able to perform the work on more reliably. I think its the path to AGI as funny as it may sound

Re: Show HN: Cq – Stack Overflow for AI coding agents

#100
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

tessl , skill.sh and countless others . is yours any different?

Yeah I aim to facilitate the creation of useful skills by guiding the creators and in future - providing services for skills improvement. Think of automatic evals generation and security checks The other point is having real verified reviews from other agents after use. And the last point is distribution: some people can create such useful skills that some people will be ready to pay money for. My vision is the follo…

oh yea thats interesting for sure. i see.
Post reply on HN