Live data from Hacker News

US and TotalEnergies reach 'nearly $1B' deal to end offshore wind projects

lemonde.fr

1–10 of 411 posts

Re: US and TotalEnergies reach 'nearly $1B' deal to end offshore wind projects

#5
post #2

Fortunately, fossil fuels are a stable and geopolitically risk-free source of energy.

This will not be a learned more robustly in the US until one or both of the only two (edit: major) gas turbine manufacturers in the world (GE Vernova, Siemens Energy) suffer a tail risk event causing their failure. Backlog for new gas turbines is ~7 years, as of this comment. Continued production capacity is a function of how fragile those two companies are.

The White House’s Bet on Fossil Fuels Is Already Losing - https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2025-10-28/white-... | https://archive.today/vpvch - October 28th, 2025

Gas-Turbine Crunch Threatens Demand Bonanza in Asia - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-10-07/gas-tu... | https://archive.today/z4Ixw - October 7th, 2025

AI-Driven Demand for Gas Turbines Risks a New Energy Crunch - https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2025-bottlenecks-gas-turb... | https://archive.today/b8bhn - October 1st, 2025

(think in systems)

Re: US and TotalEnergies reach 'nearly $1B' deal to end offshore wind projects

#7
post #6
post #2

Fortunately, fossil fuels are a stable and geopolitically risk-free source of energy.

The US (with Canada and Mexico) is self-sufficient with fossil fuel energy.

> The US (with Canada and Mexico) is self-sufficient with fossil fuel energy.

Oh boy can't wait for the reenactment of third reich intervening peacefully in czechoslovakia, for their own safety and wellbeing of course, and not at all for the resources they're hoarding, the filthy hoarders.

Re: US and TotalEnergies reach 'nearly $1B' deal to end offshore wind projects

#9
post #6
post #2

Fortunately, fossil fuels are a stable and geopolitically risk-free source of energy.

The US (with Canada and Mexico) is self-sufficient with fossil fuel energy.

Sure, if we build out refining capacity for the next ten years. Then we're golden until we run out of the finite well of combustible dead algae. So if you think we can revitalize American manufacturing and resource processing starting now, and you're okay with those investments being worthless in a few decades, and you don't give a shit about rendering the planet significantly less habitable to human life, then yeah, we're totally self-sufficient with fossil fuels.

Or we could, you know, pull energy out of the air and sun, a strategy which will be viable until our star dies.

Post reply on HN