Earlier quoted context omitted.
For nitpicking like that let me do some counter-nitpicking: please write 'Open Source (OSI)', 'Open Source (TM)' or at least capitalize it as 'Open Source' so that people know where you're coming from. The commonly used 'open source' just means 'the source is in the open'. Let's not allow organizations to hijack commonly used words.
It’s not nitpicking, the term “open source” is not usually used for this kind of thing, it would be called “shared source” I did a poll on this on a Discord server a while ago What does open source mean You can view the source code: 0 votes View + use + redistribute for any purpose: 14 votes So no, your version of it is not the common usage
Professional video editing, right in the browser with WebGPU and WASM
121–130 of 148 posts
Re: Professional video editing, right in the browser with WebGPU and WASM
#122I tried taking a video and underlaying music from an mp3 i have. This is not possible. I can not create a second audio track only video tracks. When i create more video tracks i can't scroll down to the audio track. If I take the audio from the music and try to drag it over the audio of the video it deletes the video. One of the most trivial use cases of video editing is already not covered.
Re: Professional video editing, right in the browser with WebGPU and WASM
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
Any plugin plans? In case you don't know, there is a standard for it: https://openeffects.org/ Would you like to share your development experience? I suggest creating a CONTRIBUTING.md and enabling discussions if you are open to PRs.
I added CONTRIBUTING.md. I also took a look at OpenFX. My current view is that supporting OFX in the browser would be hard, since the standard and its existing tooling are not designed around wgpu or browser execution. Tooscut would likely need its own plugin model rather than adopting OFX as is. That said, I would be very interested in hearing your thoughts if you are open to contributing or discussing what a practi…
Re: Professional video editing, right in the browser with WebGPU and WASM
#124[flagged]
why not tauri?
Re: Professional video editing, right in the browser with WebGPU and WASM
#125Thats great, I really enjoy when someone try to shake the *dobe's reign
Re: Professional video editing, right in the browser with WebGPU and WASM
#126Request for transcription and transcription editing
Re: Professional video editing, right in the browser with WebGPU and WASM
#127This will only handle toy videos, given the browser limitations in sandboxing and 3D rendering. Not really sure why someone would use this instead of a proper native application.
Same argument was made about Figma vs native tools, didn't age well.
Re: Professional video editing, right in the browser with WebGPU and WASM
#128Re: Professional video editing, right in the browser with WebGPU and WASM
#129Re: Professional video editing, right in the browser with WebGPU and WASM
#130> This editor relies on WebGPU for rendering, which currently works best in Chrome or other Chromium-based browsers. You may experience issues in your current browser.
(reminds of works in IE6)