Show HN: We built a terminal-only Bluesky / AT Proto client written in Fortran
github.com
Show HN: We built a terminal-only Bluesky / AT Proto client written in Fortran
1–10 of 91 posts
Re: Show HN: We built a terminal-only Bluesky / AT Proto client written in Fortran
#2Re: Show HN: We built a terminal-only Bluesky / AT Proto client written in Fortran
#3out of curiosity, why fortran? no disrespect. I wrote a lot of scientific software in the earlier days of my career and I learned fortran to update ocean modeling software.
Re: Show HN: We built a terminal-only Bluesky / AT Proto client written in Fortran
#4out of curiosity, why fortran? no disrespect. I wrote a lot of scientific software in the earlier days of my career and I learned fortran to update ocean modeling software.
why not? the language is straightforward and loops are fast. It is portable and your code will work unchanged for the next 50 years. It may be a bit verbose, but that's not a big deal with today's tooling.
Re: Show HN: We built a terminal-only Bluesky / AT Proto client written in Fortran
#5Re: Show HN: We built a terminal-only Bluesky / AT Proto client written in Fortran
#6out of curiosity, why fortran? no disrespect. I wrote a lot of scientific software in the earlier days of my career and I learned fortran to update ocean modeling software.
We built Cobolsky. Will go public soon. Parallelly too curious on Fortran. The world is better with a Fortran-based social network client in it :)
When we are building the feed composer, in next version, Fortran will be great for the algorithm etc.
Keeping the ancient languages alive. I built some Cobol stuff many years ago. Back at it again. Rusty.
Both Cobolsky and Fortransky looks great on Swordfish90’s cool-retro-term, but we are building our own terminal for Fortransky too. There is a blog post with screenshots over at Patreon/formerlab
Can’t get enough Fortran
Re: Show HN: We built a terminal-only Bluesky / AT Proto client written in Fortran
#7out of curiosity, why fortran? no disrespect. I wrote a lot of scientific software in the earlier days of my career and I learned fortran to update ocean modeling software.
> why fortran? why not? the language is straightforward and loops are fast. It is portable and your code will work unchanged for the next 50 years. It may be a bit verbose, but that's not a big deal with today's tooling.
Re: Show HN: We built a terminal-only Bluesky / AT Proto client written in Fortran
#8out of curiosity, why fortran? no disrespect. I wrote a lot of scientific software in the earlier days of my career and I learned fortran to update ocean modeling software.
You are not the first one to ask :) We built Cobolsky. Will go public soon. Parallelly too curious on Fortran. The world is better with a Fortran-based social network client in it :) When we are building the feed composer, in next version, Fortran will be great for the algorithm etc. Keeping the ancient languages alive. I built some Cobol stuff many years ago. Back at it again. Rusty. Both Cobolsky and Fortransky loo…
If you don't mind me asking, why is the world better with more Fortran-based software?
Re: Show HN: We built a terminal-only Bluesky / AT Proto client written in Fortran
#9out of curiosity, why fortran? no disrespect. I wrote a lot of scientific software in the earlier days of my career and I learned fortran to update ocean modeling software.
maybe they weren't really concerned about portability or a decent standard?
You hit l+ENTER to like a post. If anyone replies from Bluesky, we hit n+ENTER and see the notifs. And so on
Fortransky is 70% Fortran, rest is Rust, C and a tiny Python helper