Earlier quoted context omitted.
This. Microsoft has said similar things before, and always tripled down on bad behavior afterward. Their priority is business outcomes, not user experiences or support, and that’s why even this non-apology makes it clear the stuff customers, engineers, and support staff hate - invasive telemetry, outright surveillance/spyware, online-only requirements, AI-everywhere, constant arbitrary deprecation of APIs and endpoin…
> Plan an exit strategy now, before you need it later. The idea that we'll all be forced off of Windows one day sounds like a dream, but so far we continue to be in a state where myself and many other are long past the point of wanting to leave, but we can't for some reason or another. Microsoft knows that, which is why they've been able to do whatever they want and not worry about the consequences.
Our commitment to Windows quality
161–170 of 1001 posts
Re: Our commitment to Windows quality
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or onedrive integrations and constant ‘backup your computer now’ popups which are _advertisements_ for onedrive, or Netflix, Spotify, or LinkedIn pre-installed and difficult to remove, or all of the above reinstalling during windows updates. In fact, basically any feature added since Windows 10 is probably unwanted.
As if Apple doesn't berate you with unskippable notifications to sign up for iCloud, buy more space, etc etc?
Re: Our commitment to Windows quality
#163Is this April fools? The fix is upside down UI?
Re: Our commitment to Windows quality
#164We’re not first time users, we don’t want Microsoft BOB as our UI, we don’t want ads and internet search “functionality” in our Start menu, we don’t want AI everywhere and we don’t want things hidden from us.
Make Windows 11 Pro for real pro users and 11 Home for new users. I hope a few people from MS are reading this, especially Mr Engineer.
I’m going to get downvoted for this, but I don’t care.
P.S. Yeah yeah guys, I know about Linux ;-)
Re: Our commitment to Windows quality
#165No one wants copilot. You can make it an app, but any OS level integration is a non-starter. My next laptop will be a MacBook Pro. My Surface Laptop 5 will be collecting dust in case I need it, but that’s highly unlikely.
Sure both have their quirks, but it's just wild how much Windows goes out of its way to be annoying. From a billion startup notifications to basic UI stuff to copilot and the list goes on.
Re: Our commitment to Windows quality
#166Re: Our commitment to Windows quality
#167Seems more like FUD.
Re: Our commitment to Windows quality
#168They're saying all the right things here. Fixing long-standing complaints, removing Copilot from obnoxious places, improvements to Windows Update and Windows Explorer stability/microstutter/lag, etc. I congratulate them on seeing sense, and I congratulate Apple on another victory with the Neo. Kind of frustrating that's what it took for Microsoft to finally listen to their userbase.
> They're saying all the right things here. They are not saying "we will remove the mandate to use a Microsoft Account." By itself, that shows their "care" is purely corporate, likely driven to calm down furious OEMs who will happily remind them Apple doesn't need an Apple Account to use a now-cheap Mac. Also, because Nadella can't stand the word, I'll say it right here: Microslop is still making Winslop to help peop…
Re: Our commitment to Windows quality
#169Microsoft Copilot 365 Operating System App is just trash, plain and simple.
Re: Our commitment to Windows quality
#170No one wants copilot. You can make it an app, but any OS level integration is a non-starter. My next laptop will be a MacBook Pro. My Surface Laptop 5 will be collecting dust in case I need it, but that’s highly unlikely.
I think OS level integrations that are opt-in, not opt-out, may even be popular. But they have to be done carefully and tastefully.