Live data from Hacker News

Announcing Instagram Profiles on the Web

blog.instagram.com

21–30 of 65 posts

Re: Announcing Instagram Profiles on the Web

#21
post #15
post #10

There are already several 3rd parties on the web offering this service (e.g., web.stagram.com, statigr.am), wonder how they'll take this.

Just posted the same thing on the other thread. Poor guys. I suspect this will butcher their traffic.

That's the danger that you get when your main product lives of someone else's main product. I'm the author of InstaDesk, an Instagram client for the Mac, and I've also always assumed that this day would come. This will probably affect me too, but not as hard as web.stagram and the like, since I'm offering several "pro" features that will probably never make it to the Instagram website. My next release will allow the users to use "comment reply" templates, see which comments they've already replied to, download images for specific tags, etc, and much more. All more suited to people who use Instagram to connect to huge audiences (people with several thousand followers, etc). In the worst case, I'll need to raise prices to account for a smaller niche market. But let's see, it may also result in more Instagram users since it will be easier now to "experience" the network.

I also hope they finally allow user registration on the web. Currently, users can only register from within the iPhone or Android app, which makes it difficult for people to just register in order to follow a couple of friends.

But yeah, since I've kinda expected this to happen at some point, I've been busy in the past months to work on two separate products, that are slowly nearing completion.

Re: Announcing Instagram Profiles on the Web

#23

Why don't numbers have commas?

Because some places, like Europe, use the comma symbol as the decimal point, so pi would be 3,14159...

That doesn't make sense. Everybody knows that the number of views a post has is an integer, it doesn't really cause that much of a confusion for anyone. Most europeans are used to it.

What they should do is display the right separating symbol depending on the user's location.

Re: Announcing Instagram Profiles on the Web

#25
post #10

There are already several 3rd parties on the web offering this service (e.g., web.stagram.com, statigr.am), wonder how they'll take this.

This is only a single user's profile and stream of photos. Those websites offer web-based Instagram clients, which includes things like your incoming photo stream and the popular lists. Until they replicate those features on the web as well, then they'll still need to exist.

Re: Announcing Instagram Profiles on the Web

#27

Why didn't they just buy http://instagre.at ?

AFAICT it is because Facebook now has a "not invented here" culture. They only products they have bought and kept in some form, they have bought for the users (Beluga & Instagram). Every company they acquired that had a product, but few users was a simple acquihire.

Re: Announcing Instagram Profiles on the Web

#29
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just posted the same thing on the other thread. Poor guys. I suspect this will butcher their traffic.

That's the danger that you get when your main product lives of someone else's main product. I'm the author of InstaDesk, an Instagram client for the Mac, and I've also always assumed that this day would come. This will probably affect me too, but not as hard as web.stagram and the like, since I'm offering several "pro" features that will probably never make it to the Instagram website. My next release will allow the…

Benedikt - I bought and loved Instadesk many months back (before I got the Nexus 7, which is now my primary Instagram browser). I really hope this doesn't hit you too hard and wish you the best for your other products :-)

That said, I really, really hope they don't allow people to post or register from the web. Spam is bad enough already.

Post reply on HN