This is actually pretty cool. Once I have my own personal webpage, I may even add this tool to it.
It is a project I keep postponing lol
Wander – A tiny, decentralised tool to explore the small web
11–20 of 103 posts
Re: Wander – A tiny, decentralised tool to explore the small web
#12I want to like it, but I don't fully understand why one wouldn't just put a bunch of links on a /wander page and maybe randomize the order?
Re: Wander – A tiny, decentralised tool to explore the small web
#13Ahhh... this is like my OneRandomSite.com from... 2006 or so... nice.
I think we need things like this. To be reintroduced over and over.
Re: Wander – A tiny, decentralised tool to explore the small web
#14[dead]
Re: Wander – A tiny, decentralised tool to explore the small web
#15I love this as a concept. The wander button is great, but it still needs some curating to decide what pages you like, and getting to the actual content. I guess I'd like to know the workflow moving forward? Just re-download the repo every couple weeks, and diff to see what new sites are on the list?
Re: Wander – A tiny, decentralised tool to explore the small web
#16[dead]
Re: Wander – A tiny, decentralised tool to explore the small web
#17[dead]
Re: Wander – A tiny, decentralised tool to explore the small web
#18Cool idea - it’s like a recommended set of links, but integrated into an interface like stumble upon or Kagi’s small web browser
[dead]
Re: Wander – A tiny, decentralised tool to explore the small web
#19Love this, but I need it to allow me to break the frame. I found some neat sites, but I need a button to open them in a new tab, frame-free, if I want to.
Firefox has a neat feature for this; if you right click an iframe, it'll have a "This Frame" menu with options including "Open Frame in New Tab".
Re: Wander – A tiny, decentralised tool to explore the small web
#20I love this as a concept. The wander button is great, but it still needs some curating to decide what pages you like, and getting to the actual content. I guess I'd like to know the workflow moving forward? Just re-download the repo every couple weeks, and diff to see what new sites are on the list?
[deleted]