This is obviously a missile, and I'm not well-versed in weapons tech, but won't this need a camera to actually track and take out a flying object? So far I just see gps and barometric sensing... Also 3D printing and some electronics, ok fine, but where do you get the rocket propellant? That seems at least as critical as the software and sensing side of things...
Yeah, this current project uses external sensors (a camera array/grid) for guidance. He's using potassium nitrate/sugar as his rocket fuel.
$96 3D-printed rocket that recalculates its mid-air trajectory using a $5 sensor
401–410 of 561 posts
Re: $96 3D-printed rocket that recalculates its mid-air trajectory using a $5 sensor
#402Check out his code. It’s a joke. His control loop is a naive proportional response that doesnt even account for error let alone interpolate trajectory. Look at rocket.txt and launcher.tx. Especially the “fusion” function. lol. Stay in school kid.
I like to put down peoples achievements to cope too sometimes, though usually not by insulting their code. This kid is likely only able to do what they're doing because their Mom and Dad can afford to buy them the tools (mainly a 3D printer and lots of powertools and other stuff) to live out their hobby like this. I didn't have that as a teen. But fuck me dude, even with that, he built a manpad in his garage. Like ev…
Re: $96 3D-printed rocket that recalculates its mid-air trajectory using a $5 sensor
#403In the two test launches shown in the video, the "missile" doesn't fly straight nor does it demonstrate ability to be "guided" by the launcher towards any particular target. It's also incredibly slow. There are children's rocket kits that fly significantly faster than this.
The video is also cut in a way so you cannot tell that the launch seems to have been a complete failure? The rocket is vertical at the last frame: https://i.imgur.com/e2Kld6I.png
Re: $96 3D-printed rocket that recalculates its mid-air trajectory using a $5 sensor
#404In the two test launches shown in the video, the "missile" doesn't fly straight nor does it demonstrate ability to be "guided" by the launcher towards any particular target. It's also incredibly slow. There are children's rocket kits that fly significantly faster than this.
(A quadcopter is perfectly guidable, but it must be slower than a rocket, and costs more than $96.)
Re: $96 3D-printed rocket that recalculates its mid-air trajectory using a $5 sensor
#405On the defensive side, see perhaps this phased array radar system with a 20km range: * https://github.com/NawfalMotii79/PLFM_RADAR
What a time to be alive. In fact, I think I now have all I need to start a war with my neighbours.
But now you can start a very destructive war with your neighbors. Thanks to modern technology, you don't have to bother beating your neighbor to death with a wooden club, you now can annihilate them, and basically anything in their immediate vicinity, from a comfortable distance :D
Re: $96 3D-printed rocket that recalculates its mid-air trajectory using a $5 sensor
#406In the two test launches shown in the video, the "missile" doesn't fly straight nor does it demonstrate ability to be "guided" by the launcher towards any particular target. It's also incredibly slow. There are children's rocket kits that fly significantly faster than this.
I frankly would care little about the speed; it can always be improved with a better propellant. I would care about a cheap ability to guide the rocket. If it's there, it may be consequential for a real (para)military application. (A quadcopter is perfectly guidable, but it must be slower than a rocket, and costs more than $96.)
Re: $96 3D-printed rocket that recalculates its mid-air trajectory using a $5 sensor
#407In the two test launches shown in the video, the "missile" doesn't fly straight nor does it demonstrate ability to be "guided" by the launcher towards any particular target. It's also incredibly slow. There are children's rocket kits that fly significantly faster than this.
Re: $96 3D-printed rocket that recalculates its mid-air trajectory using a $5 sensor
#408Earlier quoted context omitted.
What a time to be alive. In fact, I think I now have all I need to start a war with my neighbours.
you could have started a war with your neighbors using only sticks and stones - indeed, much of human history is people starting wars with their neighbors using weapons that we today would call primitive. But now you can start a very destructive war with your neighbors. Thanks to modern technology, you don't have to bother beating your neighbor to death with a wooden club, you now can annihilate them, and basically a…
Re: $96 3D-printed rocket that recalculates its mid-air trajectory using a $5 sensor
#409Not that this matters for the topic, but I don't see why people have started saying "weapons system" instead of "weapon".
Re: $96 3D-printed rocket that recalculates its mid-air trajectory using a $5 sensor
#410On the other hand, there is a lot to be said for making them blow their $1k active countermeasures on your $500 missiles before sending a real one in to finish the job. Heck, even just forcing your adversary to treat every sky like it's hostile is worth a lot.
Both approaches are clearly worthy of development.