Live data from Hacker News

DOJ to Allow Hiring of US Prosecutors Straight Out of Law School

news.bloomberglaw.com

21–24 of 24 posts

Re: DOJ to Allow Hiring of US Prosecutors Straight Out of Law School

#21
Previously per Harvard law school advice:

USAOs do not ordinarily hire AUSAs directly from law school or clerkships. The limited exception to this practice is the Department of Justice’s Honors Program, which typically includes some AUSA positions. If accepted through the Honors Program, an applicant can become an AUSA straight out of a clerkship or fellowship. For the most part, however, AUSAs are hired at least three but more commonly four to eight years out of law school, after a clerkship and/or time litigating for a law firm, working as an Assistant District Attorney (ADA), or obtaining comparable litigation experience, perhaps at a state Attorney General’s or City Attorney’s office. Hiring decisions are holistic, and rest on one’s academic record, litigation experience, writing skills, commitment to public service, personal recommendations, and interviews.

https://hls.harvard.edu/bernard-koteen-office-of-public-inte...

Re: DOJ to Allow Hiring of US Prosecutors Straight Out of Law School

#22

I think resigning in protest does more harm than good in the long run. They just replace you with a loyalist or an incompetent. Don't do their job for them. Make them fire you.

> resigning in protest does more harm than good in the long run. They just replace you with a loyalist or an incompetent We’re seeing measurable effects from these resignations. A competent prosecutor could have indicted Comey. They resigned. And Halligan dropped the ball. Same as the other make-up obsessed idiots behind them.

Indicted Comey?? For what? Getting Trump elected? The only thing I think was questionable that he did was swing an election by choosing to reopen those emails.

Re: DOJ to Allow Hiring of US Prosecutors Straight Out of Law School

#23
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> resigning in protest does more harm than good in the long run. They just replace you with a loyalist or an incompetent We’re seeing measurable effects from these resignations. A competent prosecutor could have indicted Comey. They resigned. And Halligan dropped the ball. Same as the other make-up obsessed idiots behind them.

Indicted Comey?? For what? Getting Trump elected? The only thing I think was questionable that he did was swing an election by choosing to reopen those emails.

He was actually indicted for "false statements and obstruction in congressional testimony".

Re: DOJ to Allow Hiring of US Prosecutors Straight Out of Law School

#24
post #23
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Indicted Comey?? For what? Getting Trump elected? The only thing I think was questionable that he did was swing an election by choosing to reopen those emails.

He was actually indicted for "false statements and obstruction in congressional testimony".

> He was actually indicted

Technically, he wasn’t “actually indicted.” The indictment was thrown out on procedural grounds. That means it never actually was.

Post reply on HN