Live data from Hacker News

MoD sources warn Palantir role at heart of government is threat to UK security

thenerve.news

51–60 of 326 posts

Re: MoD sources warn Palantir role at heart of government is threat to UK security

#54
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's what you get when decisions are made by people who don't understand anything about the stuff they vote on.

...but understand and appreciate bribes very well

Just ask Wes Streeting and Peter Mandelson.

Re: MoD sources warn Palantir role at heart of government is threat to UK security

#55
post #29

The fact Alex Karp has any security clearance at all boggles the mind.

Isnt this required anyway for everybody doing military & gov contracts?

Not for Jared Kushner and I expect he's not the only one.

Re: MoD sources warn Palantir role at heart of government is threat to UK security

#57
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Seems unlikely. I've seen teams at GDS + teams based on the GDS way of working in other UK gov departments solve some really knarly problems.

Counter to that I’ve seen a £37m contract for a form on gov uk with absolutely no change in process, just going from a letter received to a online form

GDS went from an internal distruptor, breaking the consultancy oligopoly to being another entry gate.

The companies who capitalised on this (Kainos/Equal Experts/ScrumConnect) are now their own oligopoly.

It's just big guys charging arms/legs for average work again.

Re: MoD sources warn Palantir role at heart of government is threat to UK security

#59
post #56
post #29

The fact Alex Karp has any security clearance at all boggles the mind.

[flagged]

It is his opinions and political goals. Not because he is maybe possibly on spectrum, which is something that does not make him any less awful.

Re: MoD sources warn Palantir role at heart of government is threat to UK security

#60
post #56
post #29

The fact Alex Karp has any security clearance at all boggles the mind.

[flagged]

Could it be people dislike him because he enables anti-democratic capabilities like mass domestic surveillance, and enthusiastically supports an administration with little regard for the law?
Post reply on HN