Live data from Hacker News

Starlink Mini as a failover

jackpearce.co.uk

31–40 of 249 posts

Re: Starlink Mini as a failover

#31
post #19
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That and what it's done for ground based astronomy.

What has it done for ground based astronomy?

As an astronomer, nothing meaningful. Oh, apart from making it possible for me to have a dark sky site that’s miles from anywhere, including the nearest cell tower.

Bastards.

Re: Starlink Mini as a failover

#33
post #8

Using a 4g/5g router is much easier and probably cheaper/power efficient. Depending on your area you don't even need an external one. A simple 4g dongle would do.

Unifi (which the OP uses) even has dedicated devices for this type of failover: https://help.ui.com/hc/en-us/articles/29887153953559-UniFi-5...

Re: Starlink Mini as a failover

#34

[flagged]

His politics are less extreme than you probably think. Modern journalism goes for clicks, which means generating outrage.

> Modern journalism goes for clicks, which means generating outrage.

Is this about journalists talking about musk, or about musk himself? I mostly learn about his views through his own tweets that twitter always makes sure to serve me in my home page, and "goes for clicks"/"generating outrage" seems to fit well how musk uses his platform. In any case, his politics seem awful to me even without any journalistic mediation of them.

Re: Starlink Mini as a failover

#35
post #8

Using a 4g/5g router is much easier and probably cheaper/power efficient. Depending on your area you don't even need an external one. A simple 4g dongle would do.

When here is local power outage and everyone switches to 4g/5g, it is overwhelmed and unusable.

Re: Starlink Mini as a failover

#36
post #30

[flagged]

I don't understand this mentality. What makes Musk different than Blackrock for instance? Or Monsanto, or Shell, or any corporation both of us rely on and support, in return for being able to eat, fuel our car, etc. Is it because Musk isn't lobbying behind the corporation but doing it publically? I truly don't understand where ya'll draw the line. I truly don't care what other people do or want, I just look to ensure…

> I don't understand this mentality.

I think it's pretty easy to understand.

You have a service you want, but subscribing to it is a clear and direct way to financially support the advancement of fascist, extremist political groups and regimes pushing alarmingly racist and xenophobic policies not only in the US but also across the world.

Does your convenience justify a totalitarian shift? I don't think so. Do you think it does?

Re: Starlink Mini as a failover

#39
post #30

[flagged]

I don't understand this mentality. What makes Musk different than Blackrock for instance? Or Monsanto, or Shell, or any corporation both of us rely on and support, in return for being able to eat, fuel our car, etc. Is it because Musk isn't lobbying behind the corporation but doing it publically? I truly don't understand where ya'll draw the line. I truly don't care what other people do or want, I just look to ensure…

You know if your internet drops out you could just use your phone or idk not have internet for a bit.

You dont NEED a starlink like you need food or being able to commute etc.

Tesla, starlink are more a luxury for an average hn user.

Re: Starlink Mini as a failover

#40
post #18

[flagged]

I guarantee you, you’re giving money to people much worse than him every time you shop, without realizing it.

> I guarantee you, you’re giving money to people much worse than him every time you shop, without realizing it.

Your assumption lies on the "without realizing it".

If you realize how bad the people are, you can do something about it.

The likes of Musk are extremely bad, and have been personally responsible for many, many abhorrent developments in both national and foreign stages.

Thus, it's natural that people avoid anything which is directly and indirectly tied to the likes of Elon Musk.

Don't you agree?

Post reply on HN