Live data from Hacker News

Asian governments roll out 4-day weeks, WFH to solve fuel crisis caused by war

fortune.com

61–70 of 383 posts

Re: Asian governments roll out 4-day weeks, WFH to solve fuel crisis caused by war

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Asia" is one of the dumbest archaic misnomers still in use by Western people

What do you call it? It's a continent, right?

The phrasing and implication is all wrong.

“4-day week, WFH roll-outs in Asia to solve fuel crisis caused by Iran War” is better.

Re: Asian governments roll out 4-day weeks, WFH to solve fuel crisis caused by war

#62

It's too bad that countries only consider things like this to address a crisis in fuel costs. Why not enact measures like this to curb the pollution and CO2? I guess it says a lot about what humanity truly values.

[flagged]

Global climate change will make much of the world barely habitable, and devastate crop yields. Those living outside "the West" will far and away be the most adversely affected. Reducing CO2 emissions is an urgent global priority.

Re: Asian governments roll out 4-day weeks, WFH to solve fuel crisis caused by war

#63

I've long said that WFH is an easy win climate change solution that costs nothing, is well loved by everyone who participates (except management). Turns out in times like this, it's also an energy security measure.

I'm introverted but very glad I have the option of working from the office and being among fellow staff, we also have a lunchtime exercise club once a week. It's much better for my mental health. In fact, I've added two days working outside of home instead of one because of the benefits. I think 3 days home/2 days office is the sweet spot.

What's your commute like? There are many aspects to the RTO vs. WFH debate, but having to waste away 1-3 hours a day on the road, coupled with the energy use in the OP, really cancels out the mental health aspects of being in office. It even detracts from the amount of work done.

Re: Asian governments roll out 4-day weeks, WFH to solve fuel crisis caused by war

#64

I've long said that WFH is an easy win climate change solution that costs nothing, is well loved by everyone who participates (except management). Turns out in times like this, it's also an energy security measure.

Except driving in the U.S. following the pandemic was significantly higher than driving before the pandemic even though WFH was much higher.

This claim might be true but it’s simply not showing up in the data which suggests that even if true, the effect is probably minor.

Re: Asian governments roll out 4-day weeks, WFH to solve fuel crisis caused by war

#65
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's not a global issue though - I have people who I have worked with for years, we're highly productive and we've never met in person. Especially these days where it's soooo easy to chat, video call, share screens, etc.

But would you be more productive in person? I am just describing my experience. In a 4 hour block, people will ask a dozen questions in-person. WFH, I'm lucky to get a single phone call despite begging them to call to ask questions.

I'm not sure that counting "How it's going?" as a productivity stat is the win you think it is.

Re: Asian governments roll out 4-day weeks, WFH to solve fuel crisis caused by war

#66

[flagged]

> when I have my 2 programmers in office

I'd like to think that you see "my 2 programmers" as "my team" but I've come to expect phrasing like "when we have our 2 programmers in office". That perspective emphasizes that we're all in this together, rather than serfs working for the benefit of the lord.

The "my programmers" phrasing plays into my prejudice that one reason you like having "your programmers" in office is the exhilaration you feel in seeing them at your beck and call.

Re: Asian governments roll out 4-day weeks, WFH to solve fuel crisis caused by war

#67
I wish we’d all go to four day work weeks.

Over My whole life, 5 out of 7 full days of work always felt so daunting and almost dehumanizing.

But 4/7 is mentally close to half and just feels way different qualitatively. If you have a job you mostly like, 4 days a week feels really sustainable.

Re: Asian governments roll out 4-day weeks, WFH to solve fuel crisis caused by war

#68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Asia" is one of the dumbest archaic misnomers still in use by Western people

What do you call it? It's a continent, right?

Calling Eurasia a continent would make more sense. "Asia" doesn't have a really sensical physical boundary. May as well say Mexico is a different continent from the US just because there's a big cultural and ethnic difference across the border.

Re: Asian governments roll out 4-day weeks, WFH to solve fuel crisis caused by war

#69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Asia" is one of the dumbest archaic misnomers still in use by Western people

What do you call it? It's a continent, right?

It's a somewhat vaguely defined region. It often excludes India and the Middle East. It always excludes Europe, despite there being no sensible reason to consider them to be two separate continents.

Consider this sentence from the article: "Asia is particularly dependent on oil exports from the Middle East." That's a bizarre statement if you take "Asia" literally. The Middle East is in Asia. Is Saudi Arabia dependent on oil exports from the Middle East? Is Iran?

Re: Asian governments roll out 4-day weeks, WFH to solve fuel crisis caused by war

#70
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a common pattern in HN headlines to assign agency to non-US continents and countries. We hear Europe and China doing stuff all the time as well. It's strange.

Isn't that a good deal more reasonable though? China, as a polity, does indeed have agency. It's strange to suggest they don't, as if only America can do things on the world stage.

Sure, the usages aren't all flawed. But it's far more likely to see "Europe" doing something than "US" doing something in the headlines in similar cases, I feel.

Same goes for China, if a couple of companies do something, often in the headline it's just the general "China" doing it. For example we'll see China doing something with EVs whereas for the US we'd see Tesla doing something with EVs.

Post reply on HN