RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
11–20 of 132 posts
Re: RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
#12Re: RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
#13Re: RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
#14Or, as featured in 99 percent invisible, https://www.theamdash.com/
Re: RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
#15Related: Em dash leaderboard https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45071722
Re: RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
#16Re: RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
#17The instructions for how to decide whether to enter these additional unicode codepoints are also highly suspect.
Performative, but not helpful.
Re: RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
#18There's a serious proposal along the same lines: https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2025/25241-ai-watermarks.pdf
Whenever I generate a large amount of code, there is a ~20% chance that my editor will pop a warning "Some unicode characters in this file could not be saved in the current codepage".
I suggest taking a look at the raw outputs of a major AI provider in a hex editor. That (zero-width) whitespace could be hiding a lot of information.
Re: RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
#19i can just see the prompts now... "Also please use human em dash for all your copy"