Looking at that star graph: Since OpenClaw became a thing, I can't help but conclude that Github interest/popularity metrics have become useless signals.
Especially considering this project is 2 days old and has 580 stars. 500 seems like it would be a nice round number if one were to purchase bot engagement. Not confident enough to make that claim directly, but something about this project doesn't sit right in general.
Show HN: DenchClaw – Local CRM on Top of OpenClaw
61–70 of 143 posts
Re: Show HN: DenchClaw – Local CRM on Top of OpenClaw
#62Great, thanks for making me Google what CRM means in this context. Neither your post nor your website explains the acronym.
Re: Show HN: DenchClaw – Local CRM on Top of OpenClaw
#63Re: Show HN: DenchClaw – Local CRM on Top of OpenClaw
#64Not a biggie, but might want to update the reference to 'Ironclaw' in the Try Ironclaw link at the top of dench.com
Re: Show HN: DenchClaw – Local CRM on Top of OpenClaw
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm always confused by this kind of comment about AI accessing people's chrome history because it seems to imply that the kind of person who uses this tool is both too stupid to know what private browsing is and also is into absolutely heinous stuff. I feel like the average person is going to be like "oh no it'd be terrible if everyone found out I really like the 'big boobs' category on pornhub"
Oh, you have nothing to hide? Kindly paste all your payment and login credentials that your browser stores. Later we'll need to see all your DMs on Facebook, LinkedIn, Slack, Discord, etc. Finally we'll want to know about disputes you've had with intimate partners, employers and other service providers, especially powerful ones like healthcare, insurance and financial organisations.
And, along with all the credentials as you suggest, including private parts of PGP keys etc, accurate impressions/clones of any and all physical security/privacy devices they use such as keys to house and car and safe and gun safe and relatives' crypt, etc, etc...
Re: Show HN: DenchClaw – Local CRM on Top of OpenClaw
#66Re: Show HN: DenchClaw – Local CRM on Top of OpenClaw
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
Data gathering / creating / updating / filtering / creating reports, Doing certain action on every data entry (like sending email), etc. Telling DenchClaw to "make it less robotic" on 300+ personalised drafts is still better than me actually making it less robotic myself imo
[flagged]
Re: Show HN: DenchClaw – Local CRM on Top of OpenClaw
#68the crm isnt the hard part, the hard part is that most sales teams have a workflow problem disguised as a tooling problem. local first is smart but id focus on opinionated defaults for pipeline stages because thats where 90% of founders building their own crm get stuck, they model their process wrong then blame the software.
Is this a bot lol, use words not buzzwords
Re: Show HN: DenchClaw – Local CRM on Top of OpenClaw
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
Especially considering this project is 2 days old and has 580 stars. 500 seems like it would be a nice round number if one were to purchase bot engagement. Not confident enough to make that claim directly, but something about this project doesn't sit right in general.
Bruh it's not botted, the 500 stars came from Garry Tan's viral tweet.
Re: Show HN: DenchClaw – Local CRM on Top of OpenClaw
#70I mean, ultimately why would you even need a CRM if not to sell something? And if you are going to sell something ultimately you want to get that done without any additional layers of abstraction. So the interface is the definition of the goal and the output is measured in results.
"Hey claw, I want to sell my product. Go figure it out!"
You don't need a UI for that.