JSLinux Now Supports x86_64
21–30 of 148 posts
Re: JSLinux Now Supports x86_64
#22Sorry for the off-topic, but what a bliss to see Windows 2000 interface. And what an absolute abomination from hell pretty much all the modern UIs are.
Re: JSLinux Now Supports x86_64
#23Sorry for the off-topic, but what a bliss to see Windows 2000 interface. And what an absolute abomination from hell pretty much all the modern UIs are.
Re: JSLinux Now Supports x86_64
#24Re: JSLinux Now Supports x86_64
#25Re: JSLinux Now Supports x86_64
#26The thing I most want to use this (or some other WASM Linux engine) for is running a coding agent against a virtual operating system directly in my browser. Claude Code / Codex CLI / etc are all great because they know how to drive Bash and other Linux tools. The browser is probably the best sandbox we have. Being able to run an agent loop against a WebAssembly Linux would be a very cool trick. I had a play with v86…
This thing is really inescapable those days.
Re: JSLinux Now Supports x86_64
#27The thing I most want to use this (or some other WASM Linux engine) for is running a coding agent against a virtual operating system directly in my browser. Claude Code / Codex CLI / etc are all great because they know how to drive Bash and other Linux tools. The browser is probably the best sandbox we have. Being able to run an agent loop against a WebAssembly Linux would be a very cool trick. I had a play with v86…
For a full-stack demo see: https://vitedemo.browserpod.io/
To get an idea of our previous work: https://webvm.io
Re: JSLinux Now Supports x86_64
#28Re: JSLinux Now Supports x86_64
#29The thing I most want to use this (or some other WASM Linux engine) for is running a coding agent against a virtual operating system directly in my browser. Claude Code / Codex CLI / etc are all great because they know how to drive Bash and other Linux tools. The browser is probably the best sandbox we have. Being able to run an agent loop against a WebAssembly Linux would be a very cool trick. I had a play with v86…
Simon, this HN post didn't need to be about Gen AI. This thing is really inescapable those days.
I should have replied there instead, my mistake.