Earlier quoted context omitted.
> safari. Browsing the web from a headless vps has hurdles Hooking things up to puppeteer maybe? You can use pupeteer to then use the chromium control remote (debug?) option iirc which uses websockets underneath the hood Then you can connect this from your pc or theoretically any Control server. Surprised to not hear much work on that front now that you mention it.
The CDP debugger is easily detectable client side and many websites will flag your traffic as undesirable
Apple's 512GB Mac Studio vanishes, a quiet acknowledgment of the RAM shortage
211–220 of 264 posts
Re: Apple's 512GB Mac Studio vanishes, a quiet acknowledgment of the RAM shortage
#212Earlier quoted context omitted.
The raspberry pis have been bad value for money for at least 4 or 5 years now unless you're really sensitive to the power draw. Once you add in a case and fan (required if you don't want it to overheat and screw the SD card), the charger, SD card it generally comes in at roughly the same price as more capable intel 1L PC like the Lenovo M920Q (though of course, they aren't new)
Yeah power consumption (and performance per watt) is the main reason I keep buying Raspberry Pi, I haven't find anything similar on that regard, specially for pi zeros
Re: Apple's 512GB Mac Studio vanishes, a quiet acknowledgment of the RAM shortage
#213Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unless you specifically need a pi (unlikely) then they really are awful value now. Hard to really go out of the way to support them now they've stuck two fingers up at the solo/indie/educational community and gone all enterprise. Second hand mini pc's are a good option. Half the price of a pi 5 + sd + power and you often get them with 16gb ram, a decent ssd, etc. If you need GPIO then many of the rockchip boards are…
The Pi isn't great value, but honestly, I'm finding it hard to find a better trade-off between price, performance and software support right now than the compute modules for embedded projects where you can afford to spin a custom PCB. Especially for low-ish volume or prototype stuff.
Re: Apple's 512GB Mac Studio vanishes, a quiet acknowledgment of the RAM shortage
#214Earlier quoted context omitted.
I haven't watched up the video but I went way too into the weeds of the ram crisis. I am not sure what the video suggests. This is my own understanding of the things after I got way too invested in why does OpenAI need all of this ram all of a sudden. (On a random tuesday) My understanding is TLDR: The stargate project had OpenAI,Oracle,Softbank etc. Softbank got the money from Japanese bank loan[0] at low interests…
>Almost all of that money when given to OpenAI was used/(will be used?) to commit 20% of the Ram supply of the whole world at a more expensive package because these companies just package ram in different order to get "AI ram" and then Micron shuts down the consumer brand (Crucial) >[...] >All of this does feel very cartel/monopoly-ish to me to push the competitors out of the market or the people running open source…
So it isn't there isn't enough ram to go around (period) but rather an ideology similar to this town ain't big enough for the two of us (OpenAI vs Anthropic/Google/Chinese-Open-Weights-Models)
Atleast that's my understanding of the situation and I can be wrong about it too for what its worth.
Re: Apple's 512GB Mac Studio vanishes, a quiet acknowledgment of the RAM shortage
#215IMO its more nuanced. They're likely in production ramp-up of the M5 Ultra Mac Studio, for release in the next ~3 months; they have pre-purchased bins of memory from the supply-constrained major memory supplies; and they need as much as they can get because they want to push an M5 Ultra config to 768gb to continue the "you can run local models" story that the M5 Max Macbook Pro started telling last week. Going beyond…
Is Apple telling the "you can run local models" story, or is it third parties?
Re: Apple's 512GB Mac Studio vanishes, a quiet acknowledgment of the RAM shortage
#216Earlier quoted context omitted.
And here I was hoping they would put an M5 Ultra in a MacBook Pro. Maybe they will add it as an option to the 16” at a later date.
I wonder if the MacBook Pro can handle the thermal envelope of actually running an Ultra flat out.
Re: Apple's 512GB Mac Studio vanishes, a quiet acknowledgment of the RAM shortage
#217It's not a shortage, it's a cartel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVzeHTlWIDY
While there is some market variance like the 2022 to 2023 glut, DRAM prices haven't fallen in real terms in over 15 years. This was all done by controlling supply, and it was all done in public. It starts with one of the big three putting out a statement like, "Samsung is considering reducing DRAM wafer output due to softness in the mobile PC segment." The actual reason varies and often makes little sense.
This is followed by similar public statements from the other large vendors expressing a willingness to reduce supply. Once everyone commits in this way, the companies follow up with announcements of actual supply reductions. You can watch this happen any time prices start to dip.
My bet is if the DOJ investigates, they will not find the same sort of embarrassing smoking gun emails between representatives of Micron, Hynix, and Samsung. The collusion was all done in public. The companies will claim it is just good business management, a strategy known as "conscious parallelism." They used this exact defense to get a 2022 antitrust lawsuit dismissed.
That said, their goal seemed to be just keeping prices fixed. They wanted to avoid boom and bust cycles, keep profits high, and keep prices stagnant. A massive price hike invites investigations and creates problems. If DRAM prices just never fall, they can enjoy healthy profits with little risk.
But what happens when your intentionally constrained supply hits a sudden large spike in demand? Prices skyrocket, everyone gets mad, and demands investigations. My guess is instead of being thrilled with the price spike, the executives at the large DRAM manufacturers are very worried someone put something incriminating in a document somewhere that can be subpoenaed ("how we're going to fix prices in public and get away with it").
Re: Apple's 512GB Mac Studio vanishes, a quiet acknowledgment of the RAM shortage
#218Earlier quoted context omitted.
What’s the price of that beast? #meCryingTearsOfBlood
Less than $10,000, depending on what CPU and storage you select.
Just kidding, I'm sure you're aware. I just wouldn't be the least bit surprised to see them go well beyond that.
Re: Apple's 512GB Mac Studio vanishes, a quiet acknowledgment of the RAM shortage
#219I think it's unlikely that Apple is paying the spot price for memory. They almost certainly negotiate delivery/price contracts in advance. Maybe the contract for the chips used in the 512GB model will expire soon?
Apple needs to seriously consider some sort of vertical integration on memory, it has proved it can do it with CPU's
By comparison, ram seems much more a commodity, but the game has changed and it seems like there may be an important strategic interest in sourcing and supplying your own.
Re: Apple's 512GB Mac Studio vanishes, a quiet acknowledgment of the RAM shortage
#220IMO its more nuanced. They're likely in production ramp-up of the M5 Ultra Mac Studio, for release in the next ~3 months; they have pre-purchased bins of memory from the supply-constrained major memory supplies; and they need as much as they can get because they want to push an M5 Ultra config to 768gb to continue the "you can run local models" story that the M5 Max Macbook Pro started telling last week. Going beyond…