This benchmark seems to recommend Oracle Cloud, but I’ve heard that Oracle has historically used aggressive licenses and legal terms to keep customers locked-in.
Cloud VM benchmarks 2026
11–20 of 165 posts
Re: Cloud VM benchmarks 2026
#12Re: Cloud VM benchmarks 2026
#13Genoa was a big leap from Milan. Turin is a huge leap again. AMD really is doing spectacularly well at the moment. Kudos to Lisa Su and the team.
> Kudos to Lisa Su and the team. They're a typical hardware maker unable to focus on software, which is why NVIDIA is now a multi-trillion dollar corporation and AMD is "just" a few hundred billion. They've focused too much on CPUs and completely dropped the ball on AI and compute accelerators. It's especially sad considering that the MI300 and related accelerators on paper are competitive with NVIDIA hardware, it's…
We were stuck with Intel, its nice that we have better CPUs.
Re: Cloud VM benchmarks 2026
#14Anyone have experience with Oracle Cloud and ease of moving away? This benchmark seems to recommend Oracle Cloud, but I’ve heard that Oracle has historically used aggressive licenses and legal terms to keep customers locked-in.
Re: Cloud VM benchmarks 2026
#15Re: Cloud VM benchmarks 2026
#16Also virtualization from cloud provider is way better because they have custom hardware and software so you don't suffer from noisy neighbours for example.
Re: Cloud VM benchmarks 2026
#17Re: Cloud VM benchmarks 2026
#18Anyone have experience with Oracle Cloud and ease of moving away? This benchmark seems to recommend Oracle Cloud, but I’ve heard that Oracle has historically used aggressive licenses and legal terms to keep customers locked-in.
Re: Cloud VM benchmarks 2026
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are so many articles like these: "We Moved from AWS to Hetzner. Cut Costs 89%. Here’s the Catch." https://medium.com/lets-code-future/we-moved-from-aws-to-het...
You just linked AI slop.
Re: Cloud VM benchmarks 2026
#20The most insane part here is that the AMD EPYC 4565p can beat the turin's used on the cloud providers, by as much as 2x in the single core.
Our tests took 2 minutes on GCP, 1 minute flat on the 4565p with its boost to 5.1ghz holding steady vs only 4.1ghz on the gcp ones.
GCP charges $130 a month for 8vcpus. ALSO this is for SPOT that can be killed at any moment.
My 4565p is a $500 cpu... 32 vcpus... racked in a datacenter. The machine cost under 2k.
i am trying hard to convince more people to rack themselves especially for CI actions. The cloud provider charging $130 / mo for 3x less vcpus you break even in a couple months, it doesn't matter if it dies a few months later. On top of that you're getting full dedicated and 2x the perf. Anyways... glad to see I chose the right cpu type for gcloud even though nothing comes close to the cost / perf of self racking