Live data from Hacker News

Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android

opencamera.org.uk

71–80 of 116 posts

Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android

#71
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://grapheneos.org/usage#grapheneos-camera-app

By default, doesn't save metadata to images. Always saves metadata to videos. Doesn't request or need media/storage permissions. Defaults to no location permissions. So good - but room for improvement?

Additionally all grapheneOS built in apps are going to be as compliant as possible with all of the app sandboxing and hardening features. Like mte, dcl, etc.

Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android

#72
post #58
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

tried to visit it without ublock, I still don't see any ads at all and see no reason why there would be any, can you tell me were are the ads?

Here is a screenshot: https://files.catbox.moe/ukxte8.png I do have to wonder if this is a net negative. At least for me, it significantly reduces trust and respect for the website and developer, while I can't imagine the traffic produces any meaningful revenue? Edit: Just realized it's the same ad 4 times, haha. (I think the 5th one, offscreen, was the same too.)

What's fascinating to me is it looks totally different for me when I turned off my adblocker. We are i guess targeted differently by these ad companies. https://files.catbox.moe/9einuv.png

Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android

#73
With Open Camera, my device (and seemingly many others) have phantom cameras with IDs that crash Android's camera server if accessed. When that happens I have to restart my phone. Open Camera does not have a way to blacklist those. There are several issues open about this on the issue tracker but they have been open since 2020. This is not an easy problem to fix (LineageOS uses a manually populated key called "config_ignoredAuxCameraIds" in device trees to solve this for their Aperture camera app) but at least an option to filter those out manually if I know what I'm doing would be nice.

The other two prominent open source camera apps are Fossify Camera and PhotonCamera. Fossify Camera does not support multiple lenses yet. PhotonCamera is nice because it does image processing and handles my camera lenses correctly but its UX is janky (on my device, with default settings, taking a photo takes 7-8 seconds and quitting the app before the process is complete loses the image), it's not on F-Droid and it doesn't automatically switch between lenses with zoom changes. There's also FreeDcam but I'm not a professional photographer and I'm certainly not going to buy a color calibration reference card that costs more than a hundred dollars.

It sucks that on my phone with /e/OS, instead of using a FOSS camera app, I resort to using Pixel's camera app with internet permission disabled to be able to take advantage of my hardware.

Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android

#74
What I love in Open Camera is that I am able to turn off all extra post-processing (noise, yes please) and use my phone camera with full manual settings like it was a DSLR (with a really bad sensor). Only problems are clunky UI and general slowness of taking pictures, but you get used to it.

It's really unbeatable from a photographer / artist perspective, especially because I care a lot about imperfect gritty noisy looks and full control.

Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android

#75

Would this be the iOS 'alternative'? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47010018

The pre-iOS 26 native camera app is good enough for me, and I really like Live Photos, which most alternatives don't handle. I had a one-time purchase to Halide, but it somehow stopped working in early 2025 because Halide support claimed that the app's feature unlock (used to be one-time upfront purchase, now IAP) only works if I'm logged into the App Store account I purchased it from.

From description in Appstore:

*Please note: Halide is not free. We do offer a 7-day free trial for annual memberships. Don't like subscriptions? You can also buy the app outright with a single in-app purchase.*

Is that what you did?

Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android

#76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Many programmers think they can cheat their way into designing a good UI, they just think it's just enough for you to learn and use a GUI framework, and place the widgets in a "good enough" way. Just look at the monstruosity that is the GUI version of wget, it's the epitome of programmers with no UX background trying to make a GUI application.

there’s a gui for wget??

Yep, web browsers.

Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android

#77

I downloaded that on my spare Android phone (I'm primarily an iOS 17 user), but never ended up using it because it just wasn't aesthetically pleasant. I also don't really take photos using my Android phone, I guess. Randomly, I wish more UI/UX designers contribute to open source.

You're wishing for a very double-edged sword. UI designers do as much harm as good. Disappearing scroll bars, rounded window corners for square content, hiding primary functionality inside a hamburger menu when there's plenty of room for labeled buttons, removing maximize/minimize buttons in favor of non-discoverable keyboard shortcuts.. I'm sure I'm forgetting lots, and that's just on GNOME.

As a rule, if you, a non-UI designer, are bothered by it, then it doesn't take a UI designer to fix it.

Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android

#78
post #49
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You really need to start using an ad blocker. I don't see any ads at all, anywhere on the Internet. It boggles my mind that someone who reads HN does not use an ad blocker in 2026.

Oh there are still ads as some are baked into the content, but I can live with those. How people can live with the normal amount of ads - no idea.

I had a friend years ago with laser focus. He was read an article on his laptop and I was behind him. I asked him how he tolerating the flashing chumbox ad. "Why don't you install Adblock Plus (the ad blocker of the day)?". He had to look around his screen for a second to find it. He said he didn't even register it before I told him about it.

Even a single dead pixel would seriously distract me but he didn't even notice the gif of some disgusting medical scam ad showing elbows or knees or whatever.

He could also fall asleep seconds after hitting the bed. I need at least 10 minutes - at least. Sometimes an hour. Maybe it's a related phenomenon.

Some people just seem to ignore external stimuli better than others. Whether ads whose purpose is brand recognition work on them subconsciously, idk.

Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android

#79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The pre-iOS 26 native camera app is good enough for me, and I really like Live Photos, which most alternatives don't handle. I had a one-time purchase to Halide, but it somehow stopped working in early 2025 because Halide support claimed that the app's feature unlock (used to be one-time upfront purchase, now IAP) only works if I'm logged into the App Store account I purchased it from.

From description in Appstore: *Please note: Halide is not free . We do offer a 7-day free trial for annual memberships. Don't like subscriptions? You can also buy the app outright with a single in-app purchase.* Is that what you did?

I bought Halide v1, which was an upfront purchase.

They grandfathered all existing v1 purchasers, but the grandfathering somehow stopped working for me because I didn't buy it on my primary App Store account (I switch between regions, but pay for my non-free apps using my US account because they're usually cheaper).

Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android

#80
post #30

I downloaded that on my spare Android phone (I'm primarily an iOS 17 user), but never ended up using it because it just wasn't aesthetically pleasant. I also don't really take photos using my Android phone, I guess. Randomly, I wish more UI/UX designers contribute to open source.

I wish developers put in the faintest amount of thought into UX instead of just throwing together the first thing they came up with. Like, literally just add a photo of the app to your landing page. It's not rocket science.

> Like, literally just add a photo of the app to your landing page. It's not rocket science.

Heh, I still remember a time in the internet where apps had a dedicated "screenshots" page.

That was presumably a best practice when people were still on 56kbps dialup, and downloading images was expensive.

Many telcos in the world don't even support 3G anymore.

Post reply on HN