Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://grapheneos.org/usage#grapheneos-camera-app
By default, doesn't save metadata to images. Always saves metadata to videos. Doesn't request or need media/storage permissions. Defaults to no location permissions. So good - but room for improvement?
Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
71–80 of 116 posts
Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
tried to visit it without ublock, I still don't see any ads at all and see no reason why there would be any, can you tell me were are the ads?
Here is a screenshot: https://files.catbox.moe/ukxte8.png I do have to wonder if this is a net negative. At least for me, it significantly reduces trust and respect for the website and developer, while I can't imagine the traffic produces any meaningful revenue? Edit: Just realized it's the same ad 4 times, haha. (I think the 5th one, offscreen, was the same too.)
Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
#73The other two prominent open source camera apps are Fossify Camera and PhotonCamera. Fossify Camera does not support multiple lenses yet. PhotonCamera is nice because it does image processing and handles my camera lenses correctly but its UX is janky (on my device, with default settings, taking a photo takes 7-8 seconds and quitting the app before the process is complete loses the image), it's not on F-Droid and it doesn't automatically switch between lenses with zoom changes. There's also FreeDcam but I'm not a professional photographer and I'm certainly not going to buy a color calibration reference card that costs more than a hundred dollars.
It sucks that on my phone with /e/OS, instead of using a FOSS camera app, I resort to using Pixel's camera app with internet permission disabled to be able to take advantage of my hardware.
Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
#74It's really unbeatable from a photographer / artist perspective, especially because I care a lot about imperfect gritty noisy looks and full control.
Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
#75Would this be the iOS 'alternative'? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47010018
The pre-iOS 26 native camera app is good enough for me, and I really like Live Photos, which most alternatives don't handle. I had a one-time purchase to Halide, but it somehow stopped working in early 2025 because Halide support claimed that the app's feature unlock (used to be one-time upfront purchase, now IAP) only works if I'm logged into the App Store account I purchased it from.
*Please note: Halide is not free. We do offer a 7-day free trial for annual memberships. Don't like subscriptions? You can also buy the app outright with a single in-app purchase.*
Is that what you did?
Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
Many programmers think they can cheat their way into designing a good UI, they just think it's just enough for you to learn and use a GUI framework, and place the widgets in a "good enough" way. Just look at the monstruosity that is the GUI version of wget, it's the epitome of programmers with no UX background trying to make a GUI application.
there’s a gui for wget??
Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
#77I downloaded that on my spare Android phone (I'm primarily an iOS 17 user), but never ended up using it because it just wasn't aesthetically pleasant. I also don't really take photos using my Android phone, I guess. Randomly, I wish more UI/UX designers contribute to open source.
As a rule, if you, a non-UI designer, are bothered by it, then it doesn't take a UI designer to fix it.
Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
You really need to start using an ad blocker. I don't see any ads at all, anywhere on the Internet. It boggles my mind that someone who reads HN does not use an ad blocker in 2026.
Oh there are still ads as some are baked into the content, but I can live with those. How people can live with the normal amount of ads - no idea.
Even a single dead pixel would seriously distract me but he didn't even notice the gif of some disgusting medical scam ad showing elbows or knees or whatever.
He could also fall asleep seconds after hitting the bed. I need at least 10 minutes - at least. Sometimes an hour. Maybe it's a related phenomenon.
Some people just seem to ignore external stimuli better than others. Whether ads whose purpose is brand recognition work on them subconsciously, idk.
Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
The pre-iOS 26 native camera app is good enough for me, and I really like Live Photos, which most alternatives don't handle. I had a one-time purchase to Halide, but it somehow stopped working in early 2025 because Halide support claimed that the app's feature unlock (used to be one-time upfront purchase, now IAP) only works if I'm logged into the App Store account I purchased it from.
From description in Appstore: *Please note: Halide is not free . We do offer a 7-day free trial for annual memberships. Don't like subscriptions? You can also buy the app outright with a single in-app purchase.* Is that what you did?
They grandfathered all existing v1 purchasers, but the grandfathering somehow stopped working for me because I didn't buy it on my primary App Store account (I switch between regions, but pay for my non-free apps using my US account because they're usually cheaper).
Re: Open Camera is a FOSS camera app for Android
#80I downloaded that on my spare Android phone (I'm primarily an iOS 17 user), but never ended up using it because it just wasn't aesthetically pleasant. I also don't really take photos using my Android phone, I guess. Randomly, I wish more UI/UX designers contribute to open source.
I wish developers put in the faintest amount of thought into UX instead of just throwing together the first thing they came up with. Like, literally just add a photo of the app to your landing page. It's not rocket science.
Heh, I still remember a time in the internet where apps had a dedicated "screenshots" page.
That was presumably a best practice when people were still on 56kbps dialup, and downloading images was expensive.
Many telcos in the world don't even support 3G anymore.