I’m sure the military and security services will enjoy it.
like the claude models via anthropic?
GPT-5.4
441–450 of 868 posts
Re: GPT-5.4
#442Earlier quoted context omitted.
Different team "manages" the overall blog than the team who wrote that specific article. At one point, maybe it made sense, then something in the product changed, team that manages the blog never tested it again. Or, people just stopped thinking about any sort of UX. These sort of mistakes are all over the place, on literally all web properties, some UX flows just ends with you at a page where nothing works sometimes…
If only there was some kind of way to automatically test user flows end to end. Perhaps testing could be evaluated periodically, or even ran for each code change.
There is no business value in doing that.
Re: GPT-5.4
#443Surprised to see every chart limited to comparisons against other OpenAI models. What does the industry comparison look like?
https://xcancel.com/OpenAI/status/2029620619743219811 you can see comparisons here
Re: GPT-5.4
#444What a model mess! OpenAI now has three price points: GPT 5.1, GPT 5.2 and now GPT 5.4. There version numbers jump across different model lines with codex at 5.3, what they now call instant also at 5.3. Anthropic are really the only ones who managed to get this under control: Three models, priced at three different levels. New models are immediately available everywhere. Google essentially only has Preview models! Th…
> or have zero insurances that the model doesn't get discontinued within weeks Why are you using the same model after a month? Every month a better model comes out. They are all accessible via the same API. You can pay per-token. This is the first time in, like, all of technology history, that a useful paid service is so interoperable between providers that switching is as easy as changing a URL.
That's true only in theory, but not in practice. In practice every inference provider handles errors (guardrails, rate limits) somewhat differently and with different quirks, some of which only surface in production usage, and Google is one of the worst offenders in that regard.
Re: GPT-5.4
#445I’m sure the military and security services will enjoy it.
Do you think the US military should have handicapped technology while China gets unrestricted LLM usage from their models?
Re: GPT-5.4
#446Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is a lot of opportunity here for the AI infrastructure layer on top of tier-1 model providers
This is what clouds like AWS, Azure, and GCP solve (vertex AI, etc). They are already an abstraction on top of the model makers with distribution built in. I also don't believe there is any value in trying to aggregate consumers or businesses just to clean up model makers names/release schedule. Consumers just use the default, and businesses need clarity on the underlying change (e.g. why is it acting different? Oh g…
Do the end users really care about the models at all, or about the effects that the models can cause?
Re: GPT-5.4
#447I no longer want to support OpenAI at all. Regardless of benchmarks or real world performance.
I agree with ya. You aren't alone in this. For what its worth, Chatgpt subscriptions have been cancelled or that number has risen ~300% in the last month. Also, Anthropic/Gemini/even Kimi models are pretty good for what its worth. I used to use chatgpt and I still sometimes accidentally open it but I use Gemini/Claude nowadays and I personally find them to be better anyways too.
[flagged]
Re: GPT-5.4
#448can anyone compare the $200/mo codex usage limits with the $200/mo claude usage limits? It’s extremely difficult to get a feel for whether switching between the two is going to result in hitting limits more or less often, and it’s difficult to find discussion online about this. In practice, if I buy $200/mo codex, can I basically run 3 codex instances simultaneously in tmux, like I can with claude code pro max, all d…
you get more more from codex than claude any day. and its more reliable as well.
Re: GPT-5.4
#449[flagged]
Evidence
Re: GPT-5.4
#450What a model mess! OpenAI now has three price points: GPT 5.1, GPT 5.2 and now GPT 5.4. There version numbers jump across different model lines with codex at 5.3, what they now call instant also at 5.3. Anthropic are really the only ones who managed to get this under control: Three models, priced at three different levels. New models are immediately available everywhere. Google essentially only has Preview models! Th…
They aggressively retire models, so GPT 5.1 and 5.2 are probably going to go soon.
In the Azure Foundry, they list GPT 5.2 retirement as "No earlier than 2027-05-12" (it might leave OpenAIs normal API earlier than that). I'm pretty certain that Gemini 3, which isn't even in GA yet will be retired earlier than that.