Number Research Inc
11–20 of 21 posts
Re: Number Research Inc
#12How high can the numbers go?
Re: Number Research Inc
#13An example of a similar phenomenon here https://a3nm.net/work/research/questions/#words-without-shuf... where someone interested in the sequence "abcacbacabc" is plausibly looking at the longest and lexicographically smallest ternary word without a shuffle square substring. Just searching for "abcacbacabc" on Google yields papers who look at this -- and two people independently coming up with the concept could find each other in this way if they write examples the same way even if they don't use the same words to define the concept.
(A related resource in maths is the OEIS https://oeis.org/ to see whether the integer sequence you came up with has already been studied or has another non-obvious reformulation.)
Re: Number Research Inc
#1467 has been searched 13k+ times, more than 69 and 420 combined Times are changing
Re: Number Research Inc
#15Re: Number Research Inc
#16Re: Number Research Inc
#17Oddly, “7070” seems to always return a Database Error for me. Other numbers work fine.
Re: Number Research Inc
#18I'm not sure whether I'm taking too seriously something intended as a joke, but this in fact can conceivably be useful! When studying mathematical problems, sometimes you have a number that has some special meaning in your problem (e.g., the first value for which some phenomenon does not occur), you may be able to compute this number by brute-force or by ad-hoc reasoning, and if the number is high enough then someone…
Re: Number Research Inc
#1967 has been searched 13k+ times, more than 69 and 420 combined Times are changing
most searched:
69 29504 searches
67 13640 searches
edit: ...presumably due to the HN effect, 69 has jumped up to ~33k while 67 stagnates at ~13k!