Live data from Hacker News

MacBook Pro with M5 Pro and M5 Max

apple.com

561–570 of 1001 posts

Re: MacBook Pro with M5 Pro and M5 Max

#561

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No one is buying a base model Mac for local LLM. Everyone is forgetting the PC prices have drastically increased due to RAM and SSD. Meanwhile, Macs had no such price change… at least for the models that didn’t just drop today. Mac’s are just a good deal at the moment.

the new models cost $200 more for each 8GB of Ram you add.. Ouch...

That's been the case for years. Not new to the M5's

Re: MacBook Pro with M5 Pro and M5 Max

#562
Hot take - Local LLM computing will move to stationary, always on devices (Mac mini & studio). Developers and users will move to lighter, portable devices to interface with their long running agent workers (MacBook Airs & iPads).

Re: MacBook Pro with M5 Pro and M5 Max

#563
post #358

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can't they simply run MacOS on a VM on existing Mac hardware?

Not if you want it to be able to use the hardware identifiers to register for use with iMessage.

Not true as of macOS 15 onwards [1].

[1]: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/virtualization/usi...

Re: MacBook Pro with M5 Pro and M5 Max

#564

I have a fairly maxed out M2 Ultra (24 cores, 192GB RAM), and still cannot get this machine to choke on anything. I have not once felt the need to upgrade in years, and that’s with doing pretty demanding 3D and LLM work.

my m4max runs fan at high speed! just have few electron apps open..

Re: MacBook Pro with M5 Pro and M5 Max

#565
One thing I haven't seen mentioned in this thread is M5 Pro now supporting 64GB ram . I believe prior gens you had to go Max to get 64. m5 Pro 64GB is $3000 meanwhile to upgrade ram on the max you need the 40 gpu core variant with 64GB is $4300. $1300 dollar mark up for twice the gpu compute and 50% higher mem bandwidth isn't great value imo.

Re: MacBook Pro with M5 Pro and M5 Max

#566
post #322

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Seems very reasonable to me

A bit strange to use time to first token instead of throughput. Latency to the first token is not like a web page where first paint already has useful things to show. The first token is "The ", and you'll be very happy it's there in 50ms instead of 200ms... but then what you really want to know is how quickly you'll get the rest of the sentence (throughput)

Not strange, for the kind of applications models at that size are often used for the prefill is the main factor in responsiveness. Large prompt, small completion.

Re: MacBook Pro with M5 Pro and M5 Max

#568
post #565

One thing I haven't seen mentioned in this thread is M5 Pro now supporting 64GB ram . I believe prior gens you had to go Max to get 64. m5 Pro 64GB is $3000 meanwhile to upgrade ram on the max you need the 40 gpu core variant with 64GB is $4300. $1300 dollar mark up for twice the gpu compute and 50% higher mem bandwidth isn't great value imo.

Anyone who cares about value isn’t getting a non-base model Mac. They are buying the silver shiny thing or their company is paying.

For example, grab yourself an Omen Transcend 14, spec it to 64GB RAM and the RTX 5070. You’re under $2000 and getting better graphics performance for anything that isn’t AI, and you’ve got an upgradable 1TB SSD and removable WiFi card.

You’re also getting an OLED screen which most people would prefer.

This model in particular I’ve chosen because it’s just as quiet as the M4 MacBook Pro models within 3dB during high intensity usage and gets very similar battery life, actually better battery life than the M4 Pro/Max models for light tasks.

Re: MacBook Pro with M5 Pro and M5 Max

#569

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nope - they removed that feature, so now come the end of the year, they're all e-waste. It feels really stupid to have to throw away a perfectly capable machine with 64GB of RAM in 2026.

Wait, they throw them away, not sell or give to employees? I feel like as long as the computer is reset, indeed it is stupid to just throw it away instead of giving or selling it to someone who wants it.

They could resell, but maybe another way to phrase this, tying the screen to the obsolete computer greatly reduces the useful lifespan of the screen. But at that time, DisplayPort didn't do enough bandwidth to have that kind of display externally anyway.

Re: MacBook Pro with M5 Pro and M5 Max

#570

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> And no power adapter included. To be fair, ever since the advent of high power USB-C PD that really, really is not needed any more, way too many power bricks are effectively e-waste. People already have USB-C power bricks and docks everywhere and unlike pre-USB-C generations, you can use them not just across different generations of hardware, but across vendors as well.

I doubt if that many have USB-C high power bricks unless they are upgrading from another USB-C laptop.

> unless they are upgrading from another USB-C laptop.

Which MacBooks have been for almost a decade - the 2016 MBP with Touch Bar was the first that went fully USB-C PD. Anyone who has had a MacBook in that time frame will have had at least one high power USB-C PD wall wart.

The Windows world, as usual, has been different, but even there, I'm not aware of any mainstream model being sold in the last two years without even a single PD capable port.

Post reply on HN