Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are there any less obviously aggressive tactics we can use? Wear something that is blinding to the cameras, or something else to obfuscate?
Slapping a pair of glasses that are recording you, processing your face, sending biometrics and images back to one of the worst privacy offenders on the planet off of the face of someone who is willingly doing all that without asking your permission is a perfectly appropriate reaction. Put your shoulder into it. I'd rather we normalize that than adversarial fashion.. but that's probably what you were looking for.
Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns
201–210 of 870 posts
Re: Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns
#202Just think of the children. Changing a soiled garment, transmitting video of the whole ordeal, isn't that super illegal?
To be illegal, it would either have to be focused on the genitals or of sexual content. Nudity is not automatically sexual.
Re: Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns
#203"People just submitted it. I don't know why. They 'trust me'. Dumb fucks." -Mark Zuckerberg, 2004
oh come on, who of us didn't go through a power-tripping edge lord phase? i too had a community game server once...
Re: Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns
#204Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
People don't care about privacy as long as a faceless corporation is doing the spying. People very much care if it has a plausible path to embarrassing or creepy situations involving actual people in your life. The chilling effect of ubiquitous phone cameras is well documented now this would amp it up by a 100. Many cool clubs already put stickers on phone cameras.
Can you elaborate on this?
Re: Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns
#205Earlier quoted context omitted.
i actually agree with this take; i dont see the problem that smart glasses solve. what, my phone screen isnt literally in front of my eyeballs 24/7? i have a need to be absolutely plugged into scrolling social media and consuming content so much that i just have to have the screen in my glasses? this feels much more like what tech companies want people to want rather than what people want.
You don't want your hands free?
Re: Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns
#206It's genuinely uncanny to see good tech journalism.. it's normally so much worse than this
Re: Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns
#207Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
People don't care about privacy as long as a faceless corporation is doing the spying. People very much care if it has a plausible path to embarrassing or creepy situations involving actual people in your life. The chilling effect of ubiquitous phone cameras is well documented now this would amp it up by a 100. Many cool clubs already put stickers on phone cameras.
This isn't true. Most everyone hates the fact they are being surveilled, but it is pervasive and people only can deal with so many complications in life.
Avoiding surveillance is not a decision or action, it is 1000 decisions and actions. Endless decisions and actions.
Re: Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns
#208I do think it's completely unacceptable if Meta makes the glasses unable to be used for routine functions without (a) other humans reviewing your private content and (b) AI training on your content. There needs to be total transparency to people when this is happening - these are absolutes. But I'm a bit confused by the article because it describes things that seem really unlikely given how the glasses work. They shi…
I feel like this article is either a bombshell, or totally confused.
Re: Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns
#209Earlier quoted context omitted.
It seems his values aren’t much better now. Too bad his company is so successful.
Remember when facebook was busted playing silent audio so the app could stay active in the background? I honestly don't think there's a company I trust less than facebook/meta. And it's because the rot is at the top, and has always been there.
https://techcrunch.com/2015/10/22/facebook-says-it-fixed-a-b...
Supposedly it was a bug, but with Facebook, who knows.
Re: Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns
#210Earlier quoted context omitted.
Slapping a pair of glasses that are recording you, processing your face, sending biometrics and images back to one of the worst privacy offenders on the planet off of the face of someone who is willingly doing all that without asking your permission is a perfectly appropriate reaction. Put your shoulder into it. I'd rather we normalize that than adversarial fashion.. but that's probably what you were looking for.
While I'd like to agree with you, and do in some cases, there are many cases where this just isn't a feasible approach. For example, a peer coworker has a pair of these. I just don't interact with her while she is wearing them. If my boss were to get a pair there is no way I can justify slapping them off his face.
I think even the political activists will be extremely divided on this one. You have privacy on one hand, accessibility and a genuinely life-changing technology on the other.