Live data from Hacker News

iPhone 17e

apple.com

161–170 of 517 posts

Re: iPhone 17e

#161
post #112

Still holding onto my 13 mini. Dreaming of another small form factor release one of these announcements.. :'}

It always surprises me that the mini was ~1% of sales and yet the pro mini comments get so many upvotes

It was 3-5%, if I remember the numbers correctly. There are rumors that the Air didn’t sell better.

Re: iPhone 17e

#162
post #102

I'd love to have a smaller/cheaper phone but I continue to hold onto my Pro from a couple years ago is for the high end camera, particularly the telephoto lens. No, I don't need it all the time. But when you do need it, it's invaluable.

What I would like is a really good single camera. If that's even possible. One thing I find sort of irritating about the multi-camera setup on my iPhone is that using it as a magnifier is often frustrating. Get too close to something and it decides to switch cameras, which then means now you're actually looking at something else entirely. Maybe I'm missing a setting somewhere, I can't be the only person to notice how awkwardly the functionality is implemented.

Re: iPhone 17e

#164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, they couldn’t, because then the company would stop existing due to lack of sales.

Bell System released about 10 models over 110 years, worked out just fine for them.

Yeah, because it had a government-sanctioned monopoly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingsbury_Commitment

Re: iPhone 17e

#165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just upgraded from a 12 mini to a 13 mini with more storage. I intend for it to last another 5 years.

One can only hope... My 13 mini's performance, especially for the Camera and Safari seem to have hit new lows with iOS 26. I'm sticking with the mini for its size, but also its weight. So far the Air is the only alternative I think I could switch to, but apparently that's also on Apple's chopping block due to poor sales.

The 17e weighs only 4 grams more than the Air, would certainly be worth the smaller size for me.

Re: iPhone 17e

#166

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Taking inflation into account, a $599 iPhone in 2026 would have been $380 in 2007. Given that the actual launch price in 2007 was $499, that's a pretty hefty drop.

$499 with carrier subsidy too

It didn't take much longer to get a 3G for that price with no subsidy.

Re: iPhone 17e

#167

$599 still feels like they're setting whatever price they can get away with. It's been 20 years, why don't we have sub $500 new iPhones yet?

Taking inflation into account, a $599 iPhone in 2026 would have been $380 in 2007. Given that the actual launch price in 2007 was $499, that's a pretty hefty drop.

A technology doodad getting 25% cheaper in real terms over 15-20 years is about as far opposite as you can get from a hefty price drop.

Re: iPhone 17e

#168

Still holding onto my 13 mini. Dreaming of another small form factor release one of these announcements.. :'}

Maybe the iPhone Fold won’t be two 8” slabs of glass glued together, I think that’s the only hope for those holding out for another Mini.

It will be even shorter than the mini, but also wider than the Pro Max. The aspect ratio is different from a normal iPhone. The weight should be in the Pro range, and of course it’ll be relatively thick. Not a mini replacement in my book.

Re: iPhone 17e

#169
I actually don’t want a smartphone anymore. The first iPhone was fun, the new one is creepy. I survived for many years without it, I think I can do it.

Re: iPhone 17e

#170
post #139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Funnily, the large display is the most important thing for me. I find my efficiency directly proportional to display size (which holds for laptops too). If a 30 second task can be done in just 20 on a device with a larger display, that's absolutely worth it for me. Also larger device tends to imply longer battery life too.

If the task can’t be done in a few taps I feel I’m better off opening a laptop anyways. However the market agrees with you so I must be missing something. I used to think it was driven by media consumption on phones, and that I try to avoid, but this isn’t the first time I have heard people tout phone productivity gains from a slightly larger screen.

> I must be missing something

I wouldn't assume that.

The expression 'fat fingers' concerns the phenomena where users (including myself) lack the eyesight and finer motor skills required to type accurately on a small keyboard, so a slightly larger display makes all the difference.

Perhaps you simply have those fine motor skills (and good eye sight) so a larger device isn't necessary to prevent typos and remain productive.

Post reply on HN