91–100 of 130 posts
The sheer irony of admitting spying on the global population from both.
The sheer naivete to think the United States has any legal or moral obligation to respect the privacy of the global population.
Does Iran have a moral obligation to not nuke the global population? What about Israel and Palestine?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Most people’s LLM use cases don’t involve autonomous weapons
Do any autonomous weapons have an LLM usecase yet? As opposed to say, specialized visual ML stuff that can fit on a small portable system. The DoD office staff using it for information analysis, similar to Palantir providing data integration software, isn't quite the same as using it for weapons.
So dumb, I have to think it's astroturfed. Anthropic states they're not willing to help with autonomous weapons because it's not good enough yet, and suddenly everyone cancels their OAI subscription? I just don't get it
The sheer irony of admitting spying on the global population from both.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The sheer naivete to think the United States has any legal or moral obligation to respect the privacy of the global population.
Legal, no. Moral, absolutely. I mean, aren't other people human?
So dumb, I have to think it's astroturfed. Anthropic states they're not willing to help with autonomous weapons because it's not good enough yet, and suddenly everyone cancels their OAI subscription? I just don't get it
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is hardly surprising given that OpenAI already signed a military contract. [0] Where was the open letter then? No-one cared. Recently, Claude was already used by the administration for the operation in Venezuela [1] alongside Palantir. Anthropic did nothing at the time and again... No-one cared. Now everyone cares when Anthropic finally said No? The decision for the contract was already predetermined for OpenAI,…
>Now everyone cares when Anthropic finally said No? DoD started asking for the ability to do more stuff. That's the issue here. "Two such use cases have never been included in our contracts with the Department of War, and we believe they should not be included now: Mass domestic surveillance... Fully autonomous weapons." https://www.anthropic.com/news/statement-department-of-war >So the question is, why wasn't the op…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do any autonomous weapons have an LLM usecase yet? As opposed to say, specialized visual ML stuff that can fit on a small portable system. The DoD office staff using it for information analysis, similar to Palantir providing data integration software, isn't quite the same as using it for weapons.
That’s part of why this is all so stupid. Anthropic’s red lines seem very reasonable. Feels incredibly arbitrary for the DoD to cancel the contract and declare it a supply chain risk.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just cancelled my OpenAI $200 sub yesterday because of all this, but sadly I can't agree. Codex 5.3 Xhigh > Opus 4.6 in my work to this point. Hoping for Opus 4.7 or whatever comes next to rectify this as I'm a bit annoyed over having to drop to a lower quality model.
Weirdly enough, I agree with both sides. Opus beats every version of GPT 5 as a chat interface, hands down. ChatGPT, at this point, is mostly me correcting its output style, cadence, behavior, etc, and consistently remaining dissatisfied, meanwhile Opus one-shots things I didn’t even think it could (Typst code). All that said, I do my programming in OpenAI’s Codex app for Mac. It has completely dominated Claude Code…