421–430 of 491 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's literally the Department of War https://x.com/DeptofWar
They are roleplaying. It's literally the Department of Defense.[0] [0] https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/28655-document-11-nationa...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It's a piece of software that predicts the most likely token, it is not and can never be conscious. A brain is a collection of cells that transmit electrical signals and sodium. It is not and can never be conscious.
Except an LLM actually is a piece of software. And the brain is not what you said.
> A brain is a collection of cells that transmit electrical signals and sodium. ...
That it is a collection of cells? Or that they transmit electrical signals and sodium?
Or do you feel that he's leaving out something important about how it works (like generated electrical fields or neural quantum effects)?
From that same X thread: Our agreement with the Department of War upholds our redlines [1] OpenAI has the same redlines as Anthopic based on Altman's statements [2]. However somehow Anthropic gets banished for upholding their redlines and OpenAI ends up with the cash? [1]: https://xcancel.com/OpenAI/status/2027846013650932195#m [2]: https://www.npr.org/2026/02/27/nx-s1-5729118/trump-anthropic...
OpenAI is playing games. When Anthropic says they have red lines, they mean "We refuse to let you use our models for these ends, even if it means losing nearly a billion dollars in business." When OpenAI says they have red lines, they mean "We are going to let the DoD do whatever the hell they want, but we will shake our fist at them while they do it." That's why they got the contract. The DoD was clear about what th…
"Redlines" are edits to a contract, sent by lawyers to the other party they're negotiating with. They show up in Word's Track Changes mode as red strikethrough for deleted content.
They are negotiating the specifics of a contract, and Anthropic's contract was overly limiting to the DoD, whereas OpenAI's was not.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
An LLM can neither understand things nor value (or not value) human life. *It's a piece of software that predicts the most likely token, it is not and can never be conscious.* Believing otherwise is an explicit category error. Yes, you can change the training data so the LLM's weights encode the most likely token after "Should we kill X" is "No". But that is not an LLM valuing human life, that is an LLM copy pasting…
> It's a piece of software that predicts the most likely token, it is not and can never be conscious. A brain is a collection of cells that transmit electrical signals and sodium. It is not and can never be conscious.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am going to stop using ChatGPT immediately.
No no no use it more, make sure to use up as much tokens as possible. They do inference at a loss
They don't, inference is cheap, especially for agents because of cache hits. The API prices are just inflated.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Deleting my account today once I import my data to Claude
I'm also waiting on my ChatGPT data export. I started it last night and I'm still waiting. I would say there's huge opportunity here for Claude to offer direct import tooling.