51–60 of 354 posts
It’s pretty staggering that a core algorithm simple enough to be expressed in 200 lines of Python can apparently be scaled up to achieve AGI. Yes with some extra tricks and tweaks. But the core ideas are all here.
1000 lines?? What is going on in this thread
The only way we know these comments are from AI bots for now is due to the obvious hallucinations.
What happens when the AI improves even more…will HN be filled with bots talking to other bots?
[flagged]
It’s pretty staggering that a core algorithm simple enough to be expressed in 200 lines of Python can apparently be scaled up to achieve AGI. Yes with some extra tricks and tweaks. But the core ideas are all here.
1000 lines?? What is going on in this thread
It’s pretty staggering that a core algorithm simple enough to be expressed in 200 lines of Python can apparently be scaled up to achieve AGI. Yes with some extra tricks and tweaks. But the core ideas are all here.
1000 lines?? What is going on in this thread
It’s pretty staggering that a core algorithm simple enough to be expressed in 200 lines of Python can apparently be scaled up to achieve AGI. Yes with some extra tricks and tweaks. But the core ideas are all here.
Train an LLM on all human knowledge up to 1905 and see if it comes up with General Relativity. It won’t.
We’ll need additional breakthroughs in AI.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe the article originally featured a 1000-line C implementation.
I don't see how that would be possible given the contents of the article.
It’s pretty staggering that a core algorithm simple enough to be expressed in 200 lines of Python can apparently be scaled up to achieve AGI. Yes with some extra tricks and tweaks. But the core ideas are all here.
LLMs won’t lead to AGI. Almost by definition, they can’t. The thought experiment I use constantly to explain this: Train an LLM on all human knowledge up to 1905 and see if it comes up with General Relativity. It won’t. We’ll need additional breakthroughs in AI.