Microgpt • Hacker News Board

Re: Microgpt

#31

Post by tadfisher » Sun, Mar 01, 2026, 4:02 AM UTC

nnoremap wrote: post #28

tadfisher wrote: post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you hallucinating or am I? This implementation is 200 lines of Python. Did you mean to link to a C version?

Its slop

Maybe the article originally featured a 1000-line C implementation.

Re: Microgpt

#32

Post by awwaiid » Sun, Mar 01, 2026, 4:05 AM UTC

lynxbot2026 wrote: post #24

[flagged]

Where is this 1000 lines of C coming from? This is python.

Re: Microgpt

#33

Post by rramadass » Sun, Mar 01, 2026, 4:06 AM UTC

C++ version - https://github.com/Charbel199/microgpt.cpp?tab=readme-ov-fil...

Rust version - https://github.com/mplekh/rust-microgpt

Re: Microgpt

#34

Post by nicpottier » Sun, Mar 01, 2026, 4:07 AM UTC

tadfisher wrote: post #27

Paddyz wrote: post #19

[flagged]

Are you hallucinating or am I? This implementation is 200 lines of Python. Did you mean to link to a C version?

Ya, this reads verbatim on how my OpenClaw bot blogs.

Re: Microgpt

#35

Post by ZeWaka » Sun, Mar 01, 2026, 4:10 AM UTC

lynxbot2026 wrote: post #24

[flagged]

Why write many word when few do trick?

Re: Microgpt

#36

Post by wasabi991011 » Sun, Mar 01, 2026, 4:10 AM UTC

tadfisher wrote: post #31

nnoremap wrote: post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Its slop

Maybe the article originally featured a 1000-line C implementation.

I don't see how that would be possible given the contents of the article.

Re: Microgpt

#37

Post by pnexk » Sun, Mar 01, 2026, 4:12 AM UTC

awwaiid wrote: post #32

lynxbot2026 wrote: post #24

[flagged]

Where is this 1000 lines of C coming from? This is python.

Firsthand evidence of AI bot accounts posting slop on here/astroturfing I suppose.

Re: Microgpt

#38

Post by enraged_camel » Sun, Mar 01, 2026, 4:12 AM UTC

nnoremap wrote: post #28

tadfisher wrote: post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you hallucinating or am I? This implementation is 200 lines of Python. Did you mean to link to a C version?

Its slop

Funniest thing about it is the lame attempt to avoid detection by replacing em dashes with regular dashes.

Re: Microgpt

#39

Post by fc417fc802 » Sun, Mar 01, 2026, 4:13 AM UTC

Paddyz wrote: post #23

janis1234 wrote: post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I found reading Linux source more useful than learning about xv6 because I run Linux and reading through source felt immediately useful. I.e, tracing exactly how a real process I work with everyday gets created. Can you explain this O(n2) vs O(n) significance better?

[dead]

> Each step is O(n) instead of recomputing everything, and total work across all steps drops to O(n^2)

In terms of computation isn't each step O(1) in the cached case, with the entire thing being O(n)? As opposed to the previous O(n) and O(n^2).

Re: Microgpt

#40

Post by wasabi991011 » Sun, Mar 01, 2026, 4:13 AM UTC

Paddyz wrote: post #23

janis1234 wrote: post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I found reading Linux source more useful than learning about xv6 because I run Linux and reading through source felt immediately useful. I.e, tracing exactly how a real process I work with everyday gets created. Can you explain this O(n2) vs O(n) significance better?

[dead]

I still don't quite get your insight. Maybe it would help me better if you could explain it while talking like a pirate?