Live data from Hacker News

Disney to Acquire Lucasfilm Ltd.

thewaltdisneycompany.com

71–80 of 301 posts

Re: Disney to Acquire Lucasfilm Ltd.

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even more shocking: "That will be followed by Episodes 8 and 9 – and our long term plan is to release a new Star Wars feature film every two to three years"

Star Wars has long been envisioned as three trilogies. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_sequel_trilogy Yes, I'm a bit of a nerd. Please don't get me started on Star Trek.

Wasn't the lore of Lucas having the entire series 'practically written/envisioned' debunked after people saw how the 'new' trilogy turned out? (ex. metachlorian)

Re: Disney to Acquire Lucasfilm Ltd.

#74

This means that Disney now controls Marvel, Pixar, LucasArts, ABC, ESPN, A+E, Disney Channel plus all their own original content and of course the parks and merchandising rights for everything stated above. Those businesses most likely control the top 10 film franchises of the last few years. This is a pretty insane acquisition.

Fine with me. I am generally sick of franchises anyways. It is about time we started making new franchises.

Re: Disney to Acquire Lucasfilm Ltd.

#75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sarcasm? I can think of one... EDIT: News Corp was what I was thinking.

Really? I'm not being sarcastic at all. Please share. EDIT: Despite Fox News, the Fox network broadcasts left-leaning shows like The Simpsons, Family Guy, and American Dad, which regularly mock Fox News. 20th Century Fox distributes a lot of films without any discernable agenda[1], even backing films like Avatar, or the Wall Street sequel. I'm convinced that News Corporation is entirely mercenary in its agenda and on…

News Corp, owned by Rupert Murdoch. Koch Industries, owned by Koch brothers. I could go on...

Re: Disney to Acquire Lucasfilm Ltd.

#78
post #58
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yet it would seem that Disney has a lot more to lose if IP laws are not kept in their favor, as evidenced by the Life+70 copyright extension they were able to successfully lobby into existence. Google and Disney clearly have two very different set of influences, but to imply that Disney has little control is simply wrong. Ultimately the buck stops with our various representatives, but Disney has some serious skin in…

I think this is orthogonal to the argument that I responded to upthread. The idea I responded to is that by rolling up so much of our popular culture, Disney has reached a point where it bears some kind of responsibility for vouchsafing our culture. Strong disagree: just like buying OMGPOP didn't reward Zynga with a mortal lock on the market for iPhone games, buying up the most popular media properties won't reward D…

It's an unwinnable argument, but I just wanted to vehemently disagree with you anyway (and I usually do disagree with you).

Good day to you sir.

Re: Disney to Acquire Lucasfilm Ltd.

#79
post #27
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The 100% ownership is literal. From the press release: "The agreement has been approved by the sole shareholder of Lucasfilm."

I suppose that, in theory, he could have given away non-voting shares to some of his employees over time. But then I would have expected the press release to specify that he was the sole voting shareholder, rather than "the sole shareholder."

I don't really know much about the movie business, but my understanding is that new companies are incorporated for each individual movie project. The investors (of cash, franchise IP, or time) receive shares in that movie's corporation. Presumably the profits are then paid out as dividends, or the company is dissolved, and assets are distributed. That would explain why George Lucas never suffered any dilution on Lucasfilm, which presumably is just a shell whose main purpose is ownership of the various franchises and holding shares in the various sub-companies.

Re: Disney to Acquire Lucasfilm Ltd.

#80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sarcasm? I can think of one... EDIT: News Corp was what I was thinking.

Really? I'm not being sarcastic at all. Please share. EDIT: Despite Fox News, the Fox network broadcasts left-leaning shows like The Simpsons, Family Guy, and American Dad, which regularly mock Fox News. 20th Century Fox distributes a lot of films without any discernable agenda[1], even backing films like Avatar, or the Wall Street sequel. I'm convinced that News Corporation is entirely mercenary in its agenda and on…

Pretty much all of them seem fairly consistently "pro establishment". Sure you'll see a lot of inconsistency in left vs right wing politics coming out of most companies in this class, but the underlying message is pretty damn uniform.
Post reply on HN