Now extrapolate to all other artforms. Sculpture seems safe, for now, but only barely so.
Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
21–30 of 593 posts
Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
#22[flagged]
Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
#23Google updated it early in AI Studio so I've been experimenting: - Base pricing for a 1024x1024 image is almost 1.6x what normal Nano Banana is ($0.067 vs. $0.039), however you can now get a 512x512 image for cheaper, or a 4k image for cheaper than four 1k images: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing#gemini-3.1-fla... - Thinking is now configurable between `Minimal` and `High` (was not the case with Nano Ban…
Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
#24These image gen models are getting so advanced and life like that increasingly the general public are being duped into believing AI images are actually real (ex Facebook food images or fake OF models). Don't get me wrong I will enjoy the benefits of using this model for expressing myself better than ever before, but can't help feeling there's something also very insidious about these models too.
The obvious ones stand out, but there are so many that are indiscernible without spending lots of time digging through it. Even then there are ones that you can at best guess it's maybe AI gen.
Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
#25I'm officially done with the Nano Banana name. It was fun, but can we go back just calling it Gemini Image?
Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
#26[flagged]
Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
#27I think this tech is cool, from an engineering perspective. I’m trying to figure out if there’s any justification for using it in a business world outside of: “We don’t want to pay an artist.” You can argue things like code generation are an extension of the engineer wielding it. Image generation just seems like a net negative overall if it’s used at scale. Edit: By scale, I mean large corporations putting content in…
Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
#28I think this tech is cool, from an engineering perspective. I’m trying to figure out if there’s any justification for using it in a business world outside of: “We don’t want to pay an artist.” You can argue things like code generation are an extension of the engineer wielding it. Image generation just seems like a net negative overall if it’s used at scale. Edit: By scale, I mean large corporations putting content in…
Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
#29What a great thing this didn't exist in the past. We likely wouldn't have had any of the amazing artworks that we have now. Imagine an AI generated Mona Lisa, Nightwatch or Sistine Chapel ceiling because prompting would have been so much cheaper than paying Leonardo, Rembrandt or Michelangelo... Now extrapolate to all other artforms. Sculpture seems safe, for now, but only barely so.
Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
#30[flagged]
Good!
That's the point! Whatever amazing use case you had in mind is bad and I'm glad SynthID (apparently) makes it impossible.