91–100 of 513 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They got sold to private equity, unfortunately. I switched to Bookmyname (by Scaleway) for some TLDs, and Infomaniak for others.
Can we trust Cloud registrars like Bookmyname/Scaleway, Amazon Route 53, Cloudflare more than Namecheap, Gandi and co?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The bigger problem is the unbanning The was my first thought as well. Yes, using the Safe Browsing list feels wrong, but I don't know enough to speak definitively in that regards. However wouldn't a relatively simple solution be that if a registrar is choosing to use some third party's list of banned DNS entries that the registrar then also implement sufficient unblocked components that will allow people to be unba…
There is _some amount_ of justification to ban TXT. There have been a few cases of C2 servers using DNS to send instructions to malware, so letting TXT slip through the cracks would still allow for that. Now whether this downside justifies the massive problem it causes on false positives...
> The domain ... has been suspended due to its blacklisting on Google Safe Browsing Et voilà ... ! this is precisely the slippery slope I warned about a decade ago. The indirect censorship becomes direct censorship, defeating all the arguments about the morality of such a list. And: > Not adding the domain to Google Search Console immediately. I don't need their analytics and wasn't really planning on having any cont…
How was this Google’s fault? Seems clearly like Radix’s fault.
Why was the domain blacklisted though? What can we do to prevent blacklisting in the first place?
I suspect there is something the author is not telling us.
OP shouldn't blame .online registry operator Radix.
OP shouldn't blame .online registry operator Radix.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google’s allowed to have an opinion. But that doesn’t mean that the registrar should be suspending the domain immediately in response. These two mechanisms should be decoupled.
Google should not be allowed to make libelous statements without consequences.
It’s not libel. Defamation requires a false statement of fact. Marking a website as “unsafe” is an opinion.
Why was the domain blacklisted though? What can we do to prevent blacklisting in the first place?
OP says:
> no gore or violence or anything of that sort
That’s not even the right criteria. OP is confused about Google Safe Browsing vs Safe Search.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
How was this Google’s fault? Seems clearly like Radix’s fault.
It's both's fault. Google for making false and clearly damaging statements (libel) and Radix for acting on them.
It’s not libel. Defamation requires a false statement of fact. Marking a website as “unsafe” is an opinion.