Live data from Hacker News

Never buy a .online domain

0xsid.com

11–20 of 513 posts

Re: Never buy a .online domain

#12
Hot Take: the proactive action of the registrar here is probably more beneficial than the number of false positives captured. If the registrar is aware that Google is hot on blocking potentially harmful sites, it's right that they take action expeditiously.

The bigger problem is the unbanning - for which there should be a better system, probably that should take the form of the registrar having a short grace period to aid in the Google stuff (DNS verification etc.) with additional checks by the registrar to make sure it's not being used for spam/malicious content.

The other point being why was Google banning you so quickly? This is the opaque part. Was the site reported? Was there some URL hijinks? That's the thing you'll probably never find out.

Re: Never buy a .online domain

#13
post #8

The .com purist advice is sound but you're not getting four-letter domain names that way, and in some ccTLD zones you can still. I was price-gouged out of owning a single, rare .icu domain when renewal fee for it went from 20 usd to 220 usd overnight, just for this one domain... I'm pretty sure it's not Gandi, but the TLD opetator, because other .icu domains I've had were fine. I decided to eventually abandon them al…

Yeah, what the heck happened to Gandi? It used to be my go-to, but nowadays... yikes!

Re: Never buy a .online domain

#15
I blame both the registry and Google.

If you were a lawyer, you could have fun with this.

Btw, perhaps unrelatedly, we had a domain marked as unsafe by Google as well for no particular reason.

Re: Never buy a .online domain

#17
I still remember how Google banned my entire account without providing a reason for a small Android app (more than 12 years ago). To this day I have no idea why, it was absolutely green-area fit tracker or something. There was absolutely no way to know the reason or unblock my account. Turned me away from Android development forever.

Re: Never buy a .online domain

#18
> The domain ... has been suspended due to its blacklisting on Google Safe Browsing

Et voilà ... ! this is precisely the slippery slope I warned about a decade ago. The indirect censorship becomes direct censorship, defeating all the arguments about the morality of such a list. And:

> Not adding the domain to Google Search Console immediately. I don't need their analytics and wasn't really planning on having any content on the domain, so I thought, why bother? Big, big mistake.

Yet more monopolistic power to Google.

Re: Never buy a .online domain

#19

So, how is this not libel by Google? The claim was that you were running an "unsafe site". Its their job to prove that, and not just "black box says so". And you have system and reputational damages. Go for small claims suit, $5000. It'll cost more than that for their attorney to go to your jurisdiction.

This is libel, indeed.
Post reply on HN