Live data from Hacker News

Infinite Gangnam Style

static.echonest.com

91–100 of 120 posts

Re: Infinite Gangnam Style

#91
post #37
post #31

Clever. I wonder if the illusion is broken if you actually speak Korean. I would definitely notice if someone chopped and reassembled random words in English.

I have trouble when I'm in American and I order water. I need to soften the t to a d, and drawl the word. I almost always understand Americans, apart from a few movies where they speak rapidly with background noise. Here's an example of what it's like: ( http://youtu.be/q-cAnFbEXY0 ) - it's almost recognisable, but not quite. So, mashing together sounds to create fake words can create something tantalisingly close to…

Here's another (extremely catchy) "What American English sounds like to non-English speakers" attempt.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZXcRqFmFa8

Re: Infinite Gangnam Style

#92
post #3

I have a habit of listening to a single song over and over again. I am able to do so for about 3 hours. Using such randomizer technology, this time will be dramatically prolonged...

I recoil at the thought of that—how can you stand it? Is there something behind it that would make you want to prolong it even further?

As someone that does the same I think it's to do with "ignoring" the music. I can listen to the same song for ~3 days at a time (and the same artist for longer, up to a week) but I will often find myself not realising I have music on or be sitting in silence and not notice.

For example from October 20th to October 22nd I listened to Kanye West 200 times in a row and I've listened to "Bob Dylan – All Along The Watchtower" 717 times in total. Music directly reflects my mood so if I'm happy for 6 hours and find a song that I find to be happy then I have no problem with it on for that entire time.

Here's a graph of my listening habits from lastgraph[1] that will show big patches of a specific artist: http://lastgraph3.aeracode.org/static/graphs/graph_228708.pd...

[1] http://lastgraph3.aeracode.org

Re: Infinite Gangnam Style

#93
post #63
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

que sera sera. c'est la vie. There are lots of cultural memes in America that aren't in English. You can restrict to "recent pop culture", but even in straight music, 99 luftballoons was big 25 years ago. I'm sure there are many other examples.

99 red balloons was translated to english. My admittedly-unreliable-recollection is that's the one that received most radio play. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14IRDDnEPR4 Edit: I guess I'm wrong: per wikipedia: Having achieved widespread success in Europe and Japan, plans were made for the band to take the song international with an English version by Kevin McAlea, titled "99 Red Balloons". The English version is n…

I'm not surprised. The English lyrics are, frankly, a little awkward. Nena's accent could be seen as endearing, but at the same time, it sounds a tad stilted, and nowhere near as fluid as the original German. It's a dance tune, and once you know what the song is about, it's just much more fun to hear it in the language that sounds more polished and lets you tune out the words so you can, well, dance.

At the end of the day, lyrics are a much smaller part of the musical experience than people give them credit for.

Then again, I have a very easy time dissociating lyrics (and their meaning) from the rest of the music, so maybe that's just me. This doesn't always happen, but it's not unusual for me to listen to a song enough times to internalize the syllables and sing along, and still not stop and think about what the words actually mean (even in English). It may sound odd at first, but when you think about it, you probably have the same experience when you go to the opera - try and make out the words of Handel's "The Messiah", an English opera, and you'll see what I mean[1]!

(And now that I think about it, how many people know what the verses of 'Born in the USA' are really about?)

Also, I did already know that the German version was more popular, so it's hard to be sure I'm not just rationalizing that knowledge after-the-fact! :-)

[1] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5jeelU1Vb4

Re: Infinite Gangnam Style

#94
post #51
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

magenta - I spent about 10 minutes trying to center it all, but I couldn't get Raphael.js to behave, so since it was a weekend hack, I moved on. But yes, it would look much nicer if it was centered, even more so if a designer did the design ...

body { width: 730px; margin: 0 auto; } does the trick.

yep, that did it, thanks much yuchi!

Re: Infinite Gangnam Style

#95
The audio becomes very laggy when I switch to other tab in chrome. It is fine if I switch to other application so I guess it's chrome itself throttling the background tabs.

Anyone else experiencing this?

Re: Infinite Gangnam Style

#96
post #95

The audio becomes very laggy when I switch to other tab in chrome. It is fine if I switch to other application so I guess it's chrome itself throttling the background tabs. Anyone else experiencing this?

Browsers slow down background javascript execution.

Re: Infinite Gangnam Style

#97
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It seems to me that it is. Please explain how the markov property is violated?

I'd guess each section is unique so there is no frequency analysis; the next section is picked at random instead of saying "Whoop whoop" is followed by "gundam style" 20% of the time, by "hey sexy lady" 50% of the time and by another "whoop whoop" 20% of the time.

Surely in a Markov process the next state is picked at random with some probability distribution, which may be uniform.

Re: Infinite Gangnam Style

#99
post #96
post #95

The audio becomes very laggy when I switch to other tab in chrome. It is fine if I switch to other application so I guess it's chrome itself throttling the background tabs. Anyone else experiencing this?

Browsers slow down background javascript execution.

Si it's probably the constant switching of audio clips that is causing the stutter. My first thought was that the audio itself was laggy.

Re: Infinite Gangnam Style

#100
post #48

Seems like we're going back to "Built for Internet Explorer" days.

It's a fun hack done for no money.

With that in mind, do you really expect the author(s) to tackle the vagaries of cross-browser bugs in bleeding edge web-audio API's?

Post reply on HN