I would be interested to see what happens when you do this to other types of music.
Infinite Gangnam Style
41–50 of 120 posts
Re: Infinite Gangnam Style
#42My 4 year old sat and watched and sung along with this in delight for about 30 minutes (when we turned it off, cause like, enough already...) Someone should analyze why this song is so catchy.
Re: Infinite Gangnam Style
#43I would be interested to see what happens when you do this to other types of music.
Markov models work well for almost every genre-- recompositions of classical or modal jazz tunes are particularly awesome.
Re: Infinite Gangnam Style
#44Anybody else hate these jumps in commercials to fit the 30s or whatever budget they have? Always makes me wonder if they think noone would notice? Duh, of course people do! :) Btw, quick bug report: doesn't work for me if open in non-active tab in Chrome 22.0.1229.94 on Mac OS X 10.8. Good fun and now do an automated version where ppl can paste their youtube links. Greetings, lx
doesn't work for me if open in non-active tab in Chrome 22.0.1229.94 on Mac OS X 10.8 I can confirm this bug too.
Re: Infinite Gangnam Style
#45Done with bigger squares and optimized for a tablet, this would be a compelling UI for a live DJ performance.
This is how Ableton Live works (and Renoise introduced a similar live view a while ago), although of course it doesn't take any random audio file but rather your own compositions, written in Ableton.
the real difference is Ableton doesn't have the ability to automatically chop the song into logical parts. Maschine can do this, but it doesn't automatically play subsequent parts based on properties on the current one.
Re: Infinite Gangnam Style
#46Re: Infinite Gangnam Style
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Markov models work well for almost every genre-- recompositions of classical or modal jazz tunes are particularly awesome.
This isn't exactly a Markov model, although I reckon you could draw a mathematical connection.
Re: Infinite Gangnam Style
#48Re: Infinite Gangnam Style
#49Seems like we're going back to "Built for Internet Explorer" days.